Labels

Thursday, April 6, 2017

20 TRAITS OF RELATIONALLY UNSAFE PEOPLE

20 Traits of Relationally Unsafe People

20 traits of relationally unsafe people,james c tanner,unsafe people,relationally unsafe,relationships,abusive,abuse, 
 
20 Traits of Relationally Unsafe People — Our news media is continually full of stories of domestic violence, spiritual abuse (abuse by religious leaders, organizations, or extremists), and random abuse. Sadly, today too many of us struggle in the darkest most painful silence of feeling isolated and trapped inside an abusive relationship.
The number of women versus the number of men who experience domestic violence is almost equal 7 percent vs 6 percent. In the United States, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics women reported a six times greater rate of intimate partner violence than men. However, studies have found that men, due to social embarrassment and fear of the stigma of being seen as “weak” among their peers, are much less likely to report victimization in these situations.
Studies have also found that “women are as physically aggressive or more aggressive than men in their intimate relationships”.  However, those same studies have also shown that in the end, even when they are the instigator of the violence, women are more likely to experience greater significant degrees of injury.
How do we respond to abusive relationships? Often we never know another party is in an abusive relationship, be it emotional abuse, psychological abuse, or physical abuse. Therefore the issue quickly becomes one of self-education, and learning not only what abuse is, but what must be done to bring a person to a healthier place in life.
In the midst of unsafe relationships, we often try to rationalize our need to remain in an unsafe setting. We make up excuses and tell ourselves that our aggressor will get better in time; that “I” am the one causing him or her to respond this way; that I am a bad person and this is my just reward; that no one will believe me.
In the face of unsafe relationships where the relationship has deteriorated to the point of being abusive, we must embrace realities:
  • Yes, the aggressor knows what they’re doing, and don’t spend time trying to convince yourself they don’t.
  • Yes, they know they are hurting you, but more often than not they are enjoying their adrenalin rush too much to reign themselves in, and the more they hurt you, the more adrenaline they feel becoming an adrenalin junkie looking for their next fix.
  • Yes, they are doing it on purpose, as hurting you becomes a means to an end, an adrenalin rush, or an opportunity to avoid facing their own demons.
  • Yes, they can control it. They are usually acting this way to impress themselves or someone else.
  • Yes, they could stop the abuse if they truly wanted to, but the abuser must be able to see that they have a problem and to do so might require the involvement of third party help such as a therapist or law enforcement.
  • No, aggressors do not love you, even if they repeatedly apologize and say they do, because abusers are all too often disenfranchised from the ability within themselves to feel love, empathy, compassion or remorse. To them, your relationship is not about a healthy balanced form of love. It’s all about having control, the rush or adrenalin they experience when exercising dominance over someone or something weaker, power over you, attention, a morbid ill-defined form of “self-respect” coupled with the delusional belief of the existence of social respect and admiration.
  • No, you cannot change them. Don’t even think about this. You can only change yourself.
  • Yes, you do have the power to turn your situation around.
  • Yes, there is something you can do…GET OUT NOW!!!
20 traits of relationally unsafe people,james c tanner,unsafe people,relationally unsafe,relationships,abusive,abuse,
Safety vs. Lack of Safety in our Relational Choices
For many, the term “unsafe people” conjures up an imagery of people in extreme roles such as an escaped convict, a mentally ill person running through the streets with a chainsaw in their hand, a cult leader, or an abusive spouse. Too often we engage in relationships which leave us deeply wounded, taken advantage of, where we end up left with little to show for the energies we have invested in our relationships. Relationally unsafe people can be found in every arena of life. They may excel in professional aspects of their careers, and they might be well loved socially, but in a more intimate relational setting they might be extremely unhealthy.
On the other side of the coin are those good hearted, incredibly loving people who seem to go from one bad relationship to another, continually getting involved with relationally unsafe people. Why do these great people continually choose the wrong people to become relationally involved with on a romantic, plutonic, or professional level? Many people do not understand how to identify unhealthy personality traits in people, and as a result, they repeatedly walk head long into unsafe relationships.
Dr. Henry Cloud and Dr. John Townsend, in 1995 brought the term “safe people” to the forefront in their book, Safe People. Dr. Henry Cloud and Dr. John Townsend are clinical psychologists and co-directors of a well-known American counselling clinic. While written from a Judeo-Christian perspective, they outline the personality and behavioral traits of both safe and unsafe people. Their work in this arena has become the cornerstone from which others have approached this topic.
(The 20 Traits of Relationally UNSAFE People is now available in vastly expanded eBook format.  Below is a brief introduction to each of the 20 traits.)

20 traits of relationally unsafe people, unsafe people, relationally unsafe, relationally unsafe people,

The 20 Traits of Relationally Unsafe People

Before we begin to list the 20 traits of relationally unsafe people, we must clearly establish a baseline in our understanding. People of good healthy character bare evidence to the health in their character by first drawing you into a greater sense of community (they draw you into a larger relationally healthy circle of people); and they empower you to become the person you were meant to be (not the person they think you should be).

Relationally Unsafe People
  1. Those Pesky Meddlers
Meddlers are those who feel an inner need/hunger (which is control based) to inject themselves into the affairs of others uninvited and unwanted. Meddlers are self serving individuals who will ALWAYS MAKE MATTERS WORSE then expect you to thank them for their services of personal greatness to you. They may cloak their actions in words such as, “I see you struggling in this situation and I thought to help you out”, “I feel like a brother/sister to you and am concerned enough to speak up or take action”, or in a religious setting “as your brother/sister in the Lord I want to come stand by you in this situation as together we work this out”. Meddlers will often have areas of their own personal lives which are significantly out of control, and to cap up their massive hunger to feel in control, they seek out opportunities to control challenges in other people’s lives.
2. Gossips
We all have heard and used the term “Gossips” but surprisingly many people do not accurately understand what gossip is. Gossip is any loose talk about an absent party wherein that party is clearly identified, or known to the other members of the discussion. There is always a strong emphasis on the person’s negative life challenges and struggles. Facts are almost always embellished, and there is most often very little truth to the situation. Gossips are the destroyer of relationships, businesses and lives. They struggle with a chronic form of dysentery of the mouth.
3. The “Holier Than Thou’s” (I am better than you)
Arrogance creeps into people’s life and at some point in time pukes itself out in a form of expression which gives an air of greater superiority, greater achievement, greater attainment in life, refusing to accept others as equals.
4.  “Have it all together”
We all know someone over our lifetime who has come across as having their act together, never admitting to any kind of personal weaknesses, or need for personal accountability in their life. They may tout their high quality home and fancy cars. They might quietly flaunt their investment or pension portfolios, because THEY HAVE IT ALL TOGETHER and you don’t! We may not see it directly in the person “who has it all together”, but we can certainly see in their family and friends who feel disconnected from this person relationally, feel weaker than one really is, feeling “one-down” on the societal ladder from the one “who has it all together”, or feeling the need to compete for equality.
5.  Religious instead of Spiritual
Religious people are all too often “so heavenly minded… they are no earthly good”! Religious people often approach relationships from the perspective of focusing on your sinfulness, and what’s wrong in your life. There is very little that is genuine about their own personal lives. Outwardly they will put on airs of spiritual maturity, when behind the scenes they will cuss, drink and attack people to the point where motorcycle gang members run away in tears. They can be oppressive, controlling, judgemental, and critical, all while believing they are very righteous in the eyes of God, and a healthy example as to what everyone else should try to be.
Spiritual people, who are far more relationally healthy than religious people, are accepting of others where they are and how they are in life, realizing that we are all equals on this great journey called life.
6.  Repeatedly apologize without making corrective changes
Relationally unsafe people are those who are often quick to apologize for their actions, but in reality the reason behind the apology has little or nothing to do with remorse. They apologize hoping you won’t go away, because they will miss their relational “punching bag”.  A true and healthy apology is always followed by course correctional behaviours.  Positive change is always the evidence of a true apology.
7.  Avoid working on personal problems
Relationally unsafe people do not admit to having personal problems, or they think they can fix their problems on their own. They do not take responsibility for the wrongs they have caused someone else, and they do not forgive. They relate to others with a lack of empathy. They do not like to share their problems with others so they can grow as an individual.
8.  Demand trust without earning it
Trust, if real and healthy, must always be earned over time. Once broken, it can never be totally won back, and a person will spend their lifetime trying to rebuild trust with the person they have offended.
Centuries ago in the orient, when vessels broke but were repairable, people had a choice as to how to repair them. Today in museums, we see some of those old broken vessels where the cracks have been filled with gold.
Relationships where trust is broken are a lot like those old broken vessels. There is still the potential for a relationship, and other parties can choose to fill that break cheaply, or they can choose to bathe the offender in love and acceptance, filling that crack, or void with their most precious offering…relational gold. The crack will always be visible, and no one will be able to deny it’s existence, but the real testimony will be found in the restoration of what was once broken.
We must also recognize that in many situations, once trust is broken, the damage is too extensive, and there is nothing left to repair.
9.  Play the blame game
Some relationally unsafe people walk through life blaming all their problems on everyone else, failing to take responsibility for the issues in their life.
10.  Manipulate
Manipulators or the “puppet masters”, are very relationally unsafe people who out of a huge need to hold control over someone try to manipulate a person into doing his or her bidding. Manipulators do not care about the person they are manipulating, and through their actions they are admitting to the fact that they cannot accept a person until they first turn that person into their puppet. Manipulators are HUGE psychological and emotional abusers.
11.  Habitually dishonest
We all lie a time or two, but some relationally unsafe people take dishonesty to a whole new level and lie or act dishonestly in a chronic manner.
12.  Stagnant vs. Growing
Relationally unsafe people are often those who sit stagnant in life, doing little to nothing to grow as a person, or contribute to the world around them. They are the “frog on a log” in this great world.
13.  Avoid relational closeness (i.e. connecting with people at a deeper than superficial level)
Relationally unsafe people will sometimes be found among those who appear to be loners, but don’t be quick to assume all loners are relationally unsafe. Some “loners” are simply introverts who walk through life with a very healthy, often publicly not noticed, small circle of people in their lives. Relationally unsafe people avoid relationships where deeper levels of relationships and friendships occur.
14. Focus on “I” instead of “WE”
Some relationally unsafe people are self-absorbed, where their life focus is more so on their wants and needs in life instead of being willing to walk along side of people in a close relationship where the focus is on the relationship instead of one’s self.
15.  Sit in condemnation of us (judgemental)
Acceptance of an individual for who they are and where they are in life is always a sign of a healthy relationship. People who continually sit in judgement of others are relationally unsafe.
16.  Take on parent/child roles instead of relating as equals
In today’s society there is a common belief that some people need to be re-parented. It’s important to realize that people who take on this form of role are doing so from a superiority position and are not accepting a person as their equal. It is a very unhealthy and unsafe form of relating. This style of relationship often includes manipulative behaviour, judgemental behaviour, it often demands trust from those who have not taken the time to earn it, and it is inflicted upon you by those who “have it all together” or are “holier than thou”.
17.  Unstable over a prolonged period of time
Time is often the great yard stick in life. Unhealthy people are sometimes those who experience radical shifts in stability over time. We live in a hurting world, where many people experience a season of inner pain and suffering. We must never lose sight of our need for compassion and empathy towards those who are working through difficult issues. The challenge comes when we see a person continually repeating cycles of highs and lows in their life. This form of instability can often make a person relationally unsafe.
18.  Negative influence instead of a positive one
The ultimate evidence of a truly great relationship is one that brings a positive influence to one’s life. Relationships are all about give and take being in balance, and when relationships run continually in the red, then we see evidence of a negative influence occurring.
19.  Critical
Critical spirited people are very difficult to exist around. They stifle, and smother a relationship with their negativity.
20.  Irresponsible
It’s very difficult to be in a relationship with a person who continually fails to take responsibility for his or her “stuff” in life. We all have debt, and from time to time experience financial crisis.
Many people incorrectly “assume” that the term irresponsible partner refers to financial irresponsible, but truthfully, finances have very little to do with being a responsible relational partner, and if assigned a percentage to it’s significance, finances would only rate 5% of all the areas that makes up a responsible person. You might be great with money, but neglect the emotional needs of your partner. You might be bad with money but your partner has a strength in that area. You might be bad with money, but incredible at looking after the home, the kids, and emotional support of your partner. Being a responsible partner in life, applies to far much more than most people consider, and when they do take a close look at this area, many discover they’ve been overly critical of their partner.
A responsible person is the person who does not run away from their responsibilities but makes the best decision in the face of their circumstance. Sometimes bankruptcy is a very responsible decision. A hard worker who makes a poverty level income is no less responsible than the millionaire business owner, but a lazy man who is a low income earner is very irresponsible and relationally unsafe. Relational responsibility refers to a much broader area as to how we look out for our partners and family members. Are we a reliable parent? Are we sharing in the chores around the home? Are we looking out for the best interest of our partner, and children without meddling?
To gain a better understanding of what defines a responsible partner in life, we need to take a close look at what a relationship wheel includes.  When we look at this wheel, we quickly discover that economic partnership (i.e. bread winner, provider of family finances, financial mnagement, etc.), is only a small portion of the over all definition.   While not to burst anyone’s bubble, finances and being a good provider in a home is an equally shared responsibility, and even in early Judeo Christian writings, a good or virtuous woman was defined as a a woman who also was busy out in the marketplace helping to provide for her home and family.  The concept of the man being the only. or primary bread winner in a home is a modern civilizational deviation from what the true understanding of the term means.  Financial provision and management within a home is a shared responsibility.
equality wheel, equality in relationships,20 traits of relationally unsafe people, james c tanner
Being a responsible relational partner includes:
  • Finances;
  • Being supportive of your partner’s vocational goals;
  • Being supportive by being a willing intimate partner in the relationship both physically and emotionally;
  • Taking care of your own career goals and aspirations;
  • Taking care of your own physical and mental needs;
  • Being committed to your relationship in ways that will preserve and protect trust;
  • Sharing in the responsibilities around the home;
  • Sharing in the responsibilities with the children;
  • Being fair with your partner;
  • Relating to your partner both in and out of their absence from a position of respect, etc.
It’s one thing to accuse a partner of not being financially responsible, but you really have no right to complain if you are being verbally abusive to your partner; actively maligning them in public; neglecting the home; dumping the care of the children totally onto your partner; refusing to be intimate with your partner; not being supportive of his or her career aspirations, etc.

How Then Do We Address The Relationally Unsafe Tendencies in Our Own Lives?

  1. We need to own our weaknesses, admitting them honestly to ourselves. This is an act of confession.
  2. We need to take time to internally assess and identify the underlying need that feeds or drives our unsafe character traits (i.e. fear issues, loneliness, perfectionism, the need to control, etc.)
  3. With the underlying need identified, we then must develop the social skills needed to over-ride or correct the underlying need.
  4. Realize that personal growth is always a process of walking forward, tripping and falling from time to time, getting back up on our feet, and pressing on, walking forward a bit further.

From the moment we are born, until the moment our life is over, we are a creation which continually evolves. Anyone who believes they have “arrived” at their greatest point of achievement in maturity is living in denial. We are meant to continually grow, to continually mature. We will all do so at different paces, and be propelled forward by different influences. Your journey will be unique to you.

About the Author : “20 Traits of Relationally Unsafe People” is written by James C. Tanner, Author of Excelling In The Face Of Personal Chaos .
James C. Tanner is a highly published writer, author and business coach who has written heavily on topics related to business, marketing, and psychology. In June of 2007, when all publishers had completed their tallies, it was found that the accumulated writings of James C. Tanner was reaching a potential audience of 12,000,000 readers per month. James C. Tanner has founded, built up and sold his own businesses. He has written and taught business skills courses for clients such as the Government of Canada.
________________________
References:
Cloud, Henry Dr., Townsend, John Dr., “Safe People“, Zondervan Press (1995)

Monday, March 13, 2017

JOHN MacARTHUR AND SOME OF HIS ERRONEOUS DOCTRINES


JOHN MACARTHUR: GETTING 666 WON'T CONDEMN


EVANGELICAL APOSTASY - John Macarthur's Heretical Connections Exposed


Published on Dec 11, 2016

John Macarthur is widely respected in the evangelical community, but I am now exposing his heretical endorsements. In addition to making over a MILLION dollars per year,John Macarthur and others around him (Todd Friel, Justin Peters, Phil Johnson, Mark Dever, etc.) have remained silent as some of their close friends embrace false teachers. Apostasy is on the move in America and it seems that nobody is immune. There are very few degrees of separation between John Macarthur and the Roman Catholic Church. Some of Macarthur's closest friends support overt heretics, and it's time that he is exposed for his fraudulent and hypocritical double standard.

John MacArthur Exposed (Calvinism & Arminianism Lies)




DID SPEAKING IN TONGUES CEASE AS JOHN MAC ARTHUR CLAIMS BELOW?



2 TIMOTHY 3:5

".....having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people".
In his latest book, Strange Fire, John MacArthur viciously labels
the Pentecostal/charismatic movement as “a false church as dangerous as any cult or heresy that has ever assaulted Christianity.”
As I have read and reread his polemic, one thing that becomes clear is that MacArthur’s entire theological outlook is guided and determined by his commitment to the Calvinistic doctrine of cessationism, the belief that the miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit were withdrawn from the church after the death of the original apostles of Christ. This, however, is a false doctrine that cannot be substantiated by either Scripture or church history.
Those who succeeded the original apostles as leaders in the churches make no mention of a cessation theory. On the other hand, they give clear testimony of miraculous gifts and healings occurring in their day. I have documented this in my book 2000 Years of Charismatic Christianity, published by Charisma House. Consider the following quotes from church fathers recognized by both Protestants and Catholics as the legitimate successors of the original apostles:
  • Justin Martyr (100-165): “For the prophetical gifts remain with us even to the present time. Now it is possible to see among us women and men who possess gifts of the Spirit of God.”
  • Irenaeus (125-200): “In like manner we do also hear many brethren in the church who possess prophetic gifts and through the Spirit speak all kinds of languages. ... Yes, moreover, as I have said, the dead even have been raised up, and remained among us for many years.” 
  • Tertullian (150-240): “For seeing that we too acknowledge the spiritual charismata, or gifts, we too have merited the attainment of the prophetic gift ... and heaven knows how many distinguished men, to say nothing of the common people, have been cured either of devils or of their sicknesses.”
  • Novation (210-280): “This is he [the Holy Spirit] who places prophets in the church, instructs teachers, directs tongues, gives powers and healings, does wonderful works ... and arranges whatever gifts there are of the charismata; and thus making the Lord’s church everywhere, and in all, perfected and completed."
  • Origen (185-284): “Some give evidence of their having received through this faith a marvelous power by the cures which they perform, invoking no other name over those who need their help than that of the God of all things, along with Jesus and a mention of his history.”
  • Augustine (354-430): In his work The City of God, Augustine tells of healings and miracles that he has observed firsthand and then says, “I am so pressed by the promise of finishing this work that I cannot record all the miracles I know.”
These testimonies clearly demonstrate that spiritual gifts continued to be common in the church from the Day of Pentecost and up to the beginning of the fourth century. The Episcopal scholar Morton Kelsey was correct when he said, “These men were well aware of Paul’s list of the gifts of the Spirit and what it included. In no place do they suggest that any of them had dropped away.”
In an appendix entitled “Voices From Church History,” MacArthur seeks to substantiate his doctrine of cessation from church history. Interestingly, the earliest quote he presents is from John Chrysostom (344-407), who refers to his ignorance of spiritual gifts and their cessation. The reason MacArthur begins with Chrysostom is that there is no evidence of a cessation theory prior to this time.
MacArthur next quotes Augustine’s statement that the tongues at Pentecost were a sign “adapted to the times” and had passed away. But what he fails to mention is that Augustine’s views on this matter changed with time and that he later fully embraced the continued work of the Holy Spirit and His gifts in the church (see the above quote). Nonetheless, Augustine’s earlier comments were taken up by those not experiencing spiritual gifts and used to justify their experience, or lack thereof.
While some articulated a theory of cessation to explain the lack of miracles and spiritual gifts in their midst, others throughout history have acknowledged that the problem has been a lack of faith and holiness within the church. This was the view of A.J. Gordon, 18th-century Baptist pastor and founder of Gordon College in Boston, who wrote, "It is not altogether strange that when the church forgot her citizenship in heaven and began to establish herself in luxury and splendor on earth, she should cease to exhibit the supernatural gifts of heaven."
John Wesley, the unflappable Oxford scholar, revivalist and founder of Methodism, showed his disdain for the doctrine of cessation when he wrote, “I do not recollect any Scripture wherein we are taught that miracles were to be confined within the limits of the apostolic age or the Cyprian age, or of any period of time, longer or shorter, even till the restitution of all things.” After reading a book that defended the continuance of spiritual gifts in the church, Wesley wrote the following statement in the Journal of John Wesley:
"I was fully convinced of what I had once suspected ... that the grand reason why the miraculous gifts were so soon withdrawn was not only that faith and holiness were well nigh lost, but that dry, formal orthodox men began even then to ridicule whatever gifts they had not themselves, and to decry them all as either madness or imposture."
Beginning with the dawn of the 20th century, the church has seen an explosion of the miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit around the world. Churches old and new are embracing this dynamic work of the Spirit in their midst, and this very diverse movement now numbers over 600 million worldwide and is growing at the rate of 9 million per year. This Pentecostal/charismatic movement that MacArthur so detests is actually a fulfillment of biblical prophecy for Peter, who, in explaining the tongues on the Day of Pentecost, declared:
"And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, that I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh; your sons and daughters shall prophesy, your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams. And on My menservants and on My maidservants I will pour out My Spirit in those days; and they shall prophesy" (Acts 2:17-18).
I pray that God will enable John MacArthur to see what is obvious to so many: that the Pentecostal/charismatic movement, though having many human imperfections, is a genuine work of the Holy Spirit, empowering the people of God everywhere to be witnesses of Jesus Christ and His salvation in these last days.
Eddie L. Hyatt is a seasoned minister of the gospel, having served as a pastor, teacher, missionary and professor of theology in the U.S. and Canada and having ministered in India, Indonesia, England, Ireland, Sweden, Poland and Bulgaria. His ministry is characterized by a unique blend of the anointing of the Holy Spirit with academic excellence and over 40 years of ministerial experience. Visit him online ateddiehyatt.com.
FOR MORE INFORMATION EXPOSING JOHN Mac ARTHUR'S FALSE TEACHINGS ON CESSATIONISM:
see this additional link:
Charismania = Neo-Montanism

RECOMMEND THE FOLLOWING BOOK EXPOSING JOHN McARTHUR'S CALVINISM:
 
 

Saturday, March 11, 2017

The New Apostolic Reformation Parts 1 & 2






Testing The Spirits by Sandy Simpson



PHOTOS OF MEMBERS OF THE NEW APOSTOLIC REFROMATION

Image result for New Apostolic Reformation Leaders

SANDY SIMPSON: THE NEW APOSTOLIC REFORMATION

Image result for New Apostolic Reformation Leaders



Apprising Ministries warns you that because of the spread of corrupt Contemplative Spirituality/Mysticism within the mainstream of the visible church you’ll continue to see increasing syncretism and “unity” with people and.or groups you’d never have believed could happen.
For example, who would have thought New Apostolic Reformation spiritual wingnuts and self-proclaimed apostles and apostlettes like C. Peter Wagner and Cindy Jacobs would ever have a voice within the heart of the Christian community; but we’re beginning to see it.
So I’m pleased to point you to the following interview with Sandy Simpson concerning the whacked works of the NAR. Sandy was one of the very first people to carry my writings when I first came into the field of online apologetics and discernment some six years ago.
Over at Echo Zoe we read:
For such men are false apostles, deceitful workers, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ.2 Corinthians 11:13
Sandy Simpson, of the Apologetics Coordination Team, joins me to discuss the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR). Sandy runs Deception in the Church, an extensive library of resources on the NAR and related movements and organizations.
I would appreciate feedback, along with questions about this subject. Sandy has graciously agreed to the possibility of a follow-up interview, possibly late in 2012, and I would love to have listener questions to use in such an interview…
An Outline of the Discussion
  • Sandy begins by describing his initial encounter with the New Apostolic Reformation while working as a missionary in Guam, which led him to investigate their movement.
  • The NAR teaches that there are foundational Apostles today that are equal to, if not greater than, the original twelve Apostles of the first century.
  • They teach that there is a transferrable impartation. The Holy Spirit can be imparted upon individuals by NAR “apostles”.
  • Sandy sees links between NAR, Emergent, and “Church Growth”; all coming out of Fuller Theological Seminary.
  • NAR puts together large-scale prayer meetings to lure in orthodox Christians to their methods and teachings.
  • NAR and Word-of-Faith come from the same roots, and have many similarities.
  • NAR seeks to take over the government, and Sandy asks what the difference is between “Christian Fascism” and “Islamic Fascism”?
  • Sandy asserts that NAR denies some of the fundamental, core doctrines of Christianity. This places them within the definition of a cult movement. Core doctrines that they deny include: the Trinity; the divinity and personhood of Christ (hypostatic union); salvation by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone; the supremacy of Scripture in all matters of faith and practice; the fact that Christ is going to return bodily to judge and rule the Earth (dominionism requires us to conquer the Earth before He returns).
  • We discuss the prophetic element of NAR. The movement rarely references scripture, favoring instead “new revelation”. When they give prophesy over someone, they often just puff up the person they are supposedly prophesying over.
  • “Slain in the Spirit” is a practice that is common in the NAR. It was picked up by William Branham on a trip to India, and is just a repackaged version of the Hindu practice of shakti-pat.
  • Sandy explains the practice of diaprax, which is in use by various groups and forces hostile to Christianity. It pits a thesis against an anti-thesis. The two battle, eventually merging into a synthesis.
  • Scandals and immoral behavior often follow false teachers.
  • I ask Sandy to give his thoughts on a few of the players. Specifically I asked about Dutch Sheets, Rick Joyner, and Mike Bickel.
  • NAR has a practice called “Prayer Walking” by which they supposedly cast out territorial demons.
  • The NAR has many similarities to the ancient gnostics. Namely, they place heavy emphasis on special knowledge (new revelation), and attempts to create a “higher order” of Christianity/Spirituality. (Online source)
FOR MORE HELPFUL INFORMATION GO TO SANDY SIMPSON'S WEBSITE:

How To Discern, Test and Judge Rightly 

deceptioninthechurch.com/discerntestjudge.html
additional link: 
Charismania = Neo-Montanism







Friday, March 10, 2017

The Drunken Delusion of Heidi Baker




The Child of Drunkenness (Part 2 of the Seven Mountains Heresy)


 Spiritual drunkenness 

Is spiritual drunkenness really a sign of God’s favor? Or is it in reality a clear sign of God’s judgment? In looking at the scriptural references to drunkenness one can only conclude the latter. In Jeremiah chapter 51, in a prophecy of judgment upon Babylon, we read: “Babylon was a golden cup in the Lord's hand, That made all the earth drunk. The nations drank her wine; Therefore the nations are deranged…In their excitement I will prepare their feasts; I will make them drunk, That they may rejoice, And sleep a perpetual sleep And not awake, says the LORD… And I will make drunk Her princes and wise men, Her governors, her deputies, and her mighty men. And they shall sleep a perpetual sleep And not awake, says the King, Whose name is the LORD of hosts.” (Jer 51:7;39;57 NKJV) Here we clearly see that drunkenness is a direct judgment from God. Is it possible that God is judging His apostate Church (Mystery Babylon) with spiritual drunkenness even now? It is my belief that is exactly what is happening through these Latter Rain revivals” today.
In Isaiah 63:6, a prophecy of the last days, we read “I have trodden down the peoples in my anger, made them drunk in my fury, and brought down their strength to the earth.”

The Bible nowhere contains a suggestion that to be drunk, spiritually or otherwise, is a good thing for God’s people. In fact, in the Word of God, we are constantly exhorted to sobriety and self-control. “And do not be drunk with wine, in which is dissipation; but be filled with the Spirit…” (Eph 5:18) Proponents of spiritual drunkenness like to point to Acts, chapter 2, and what occurred on the day of Pentecost, particularly the response of some of the people to it: …Cretans and Arabs; we hear them speaking in our own tongues the wonderful works of God. So they were all amazed and perplexed, saying to one another, “Whatever could this mean?” Others mocking said, “They are full of new wine.” (Acts 2:11-13 NKJV) Having seen videotape examples and attended conferences of people who are supposedly “drunk in the spirit”; staggering around, struggling to talk (or preach), talking with slurred speech, and falling down, as well as behavior that is unseemly or immodest, I am totally convinced that this is not God’s Spirit at work. This kind of behavior is identical to the type of behavior exhibited by literal drunks - drunk on alcohol. There is absolutely no reason to infer from the book of Acts (Chapter 2) that the disciples of our Lord were exhibiting even one of these “symptoms” of drunkenness. If you read Acts, chapter 2 you realize that what the populace was responding to was the supernatural sign that was in evidence – they were speaking in tongues. Unable to explain this sign in any other way, some mocked and accused them of being drunk. That this charge was spurious and not even considered by the majority can be seen in the fact that 3,000 listened and responded to Peter’s (coherent) presentation of the gospel, repented of their sins, and were added to the Church that day. There is a “party spirit” loose in the Church today. Thousands are dying and slipping into an eternity in hell every day. Occultism and New Age beliefs, not to mention secular humanism and the myriad of new cults arising daily are leading millions down the wide road that leads to destruction. Yet I’m supposed to believe that God would have me sit back, relax, and enjoy some “Holy Ghost drinking party”? This is just the very thing that our Lord warned us about: “But take heed to yourselves, lest your hearts be weighed down with carousing, drunkenness, and cares of this life, and that Day come on you unexpectedly.” (Luke 21:34 NKJV) A conference in San Jose had Che Ahn, Stacy Campbell, Jim Goll and many others who were so drunk they could not stand up for hours. They had imaginary big bowls that they were drinking the “new wine” from and teaching that it was a blessing from the Lord that he was so happy with us that he wanted to pour out this bliss on us. Also present there were “fire tunnels” which upon going through the tunnels, the people came out significantly more messed up!

While researching spiritual drunkenness, I ran across this web site:

" Our first church plant is officially launched and will start at 7pm Friday May 22nd. For several months I've gotten several calls a week for people wanting to come get drunk and receive drunk teaching and revelatory drunk theology and now the needs will be met with great intoxication at "Joel's Bar." A first of its kind prototype of churches to come. The wine is not a weird side dish, it is the main course in salvation history. The intoxication is not a means to an end, IT IS THE END THING IN ITSELF. It is the bridal wine of intimacy with the person Jesus Christ. The intoxication of God's Spirit brings refreshment to the entire person, spirit, soul, and body. I heard a prophet say lately that drunkenness is one of the highest levels of wisdom in the Kingdom. So come out to this glory revolutionary church plant and drink your fill o' lovers! Come in costumes ready to drink or just come as you are! This is the craziest drunkiest messiest revival of all time. Come get pickled in the wine cellar of heaven with some of Minnesota's wildest mystics! Caution: extreme drinking in progress. Believers appear to be intoxicated on alcohol and high on drugs, but "WE ARE NOT DRUNK AS YOU SUPPOSE!!!" Just show up empty headed and heart hungry for God."

 Jim Goll and John Crowder teach “Tokin the Holy Ghost” from national platforms. I believe these two men are promoting this teaching and it is polluting the Body of Christ and people are becoming demonized.

IN ORDER TO LEARN MORE ABOUT FALSE DOCTRINES THAT ARE INFILTRATING THE CHURCH GO TO THE LINK BELOW:

  additional link: 
  Charismania = Neo-Montanism 

   http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/dangerous.pdf

Saturday, March 4, 2017

Heidi Baker’s Strange Fire Crusades


   So called Apostles like Heidi Baker are not only after your wallet, they are after your soul as well.

“Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.” 1 John 4:1 (KJV)

Heidi Baker is a rising star in the New Apostolic Reformation, and she is connected with Bethel Church in Redding, California. She has a global ministry that takes in millions and millions of dollars every year and like most Prosperity Gospel performers, she lives the good life. And as this video will prove beyond the shadow of any lingering doubt, she is a portal for demons looking for places to land. They are landing in bunches at Bethel Church.

GRAPHIC WARNING: This video, from a spiritual perspective, is highly disturbing and is not recommended for children to watch. Please view with caution. 

Watch the video and see people writhing in pain on the floor, screaming out in pain, this is what passes for a “church service” in the NAR Movement  at  Bill Johnson's Bethel Church


Notice how she uses repetitive phrases combined with repetitive music to put people into a trance-like state. Trance induction is an occult technique, not a biblical one.  Phrases like “receive the anointing”, “ten times”, “giving away” are repeated endlessly, this is right out of the cult’s playbook. We are called to worship God with our whole body, mind and spirit (cf 1 Corinthians 14: 14-15).  In the middle of her psychic ramblings, she easily slips in admonitions for the people to “be generous with their gifts”, meaning to empty your wallet in the plate when it comes around. This woman is  just crazy . At one point she starts repeating the word “legacy” over and over again while directing her worshippers to “put crowns on people’s head” and to “impart the anointing”. This is what it looks like when there is chaos in the Church..

On May 18, 2012 Tim Stafford of Christianity Today Magazine reported the following:  “One night, Heidi Baker had a vision of Jesus in which she literally ate his flesh and drank his blood.” And “Heidi speaks of a ministry flowing from ‘your secret place’ in a love experience with Jesus so potent it verges on the erotic.”

THIS SO CALLED VISION OF HEIDI BAKER IS TOTAL  BLASPHEMY!  IT  IS A SHOCKING TRAVESTY OF THE LORD'S  DIVINE CHARACTER WHO IS PURE, HOLY, CHASTE AND UNDEFILED. AND CHRISTIANITY TODAY MAGAZINE HAD THE AUDACITY OF PUBLISHING THIS COUNTERFEIT VISION WITHOUT EVEN QUESTIONING IT'S SOURCE.  This vision obviously is not validated by Holy Writ and must be rejected for what it really is: BLASPHEMY.


 BELOW IN THIS VIDEO: BILL JOHNSON'S BETHEL CHURCH WHERE HEIDI BAKER  FREQUENTLY PREACHES AND WHAT REALLY GOES ON BEHIND THE SCENES.



Toronto Blessing-Brute Beast Mocking the Lord


Baker’s ministry, called IRIS Global, is a reference to the all-seeing Eye of Horus ”. In 1998, she joined  Bill Johnson's Bethel School Of Supernatural Ministry  as a Faculty Member to “equip and deploy revivalists who passionately pursue worldwide transformation”.

Stay far away from Heidi Baker, And stay far away from this Laodicean mess at Bethel Church. This is not New Testament Christianity, and this is not Bible doctrine.

“And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” Revelation 18:4 (KJV)

additional links: 
Charismania = Neo-Montanism

Beware of False Prophets - Prophecies of Revelation