SCOTUS : KEEP YOUR FAGGOT LIFE & FAGGOT RIGHTS TO YOURSELF

 

The Supreme Court should "rethink" gay marriage and access to contraception, Justice says after Law overthrows Roe vs Wade

 

 

 

The Supreme Court'sdecision to overturn

Roe v Wade includes other decisions that protect access to contraception and enable same-sex relationships. May open the door to revisit. marriage.

In a 6-3 decision on Friday, the court ruled in favor of Mississippi in the case of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, banning most miscarriage after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Allowed and rejected Roev. Wade.

Judge Clarence Thomas writes that the same reason behind the reason for not having the right to abort can be used in other cases.

Judge Samuel Arito wrote in a majority opinion that this decision "should be understood to cast doubt on precedents unrelated to abortion." In his agreed opinion, Thomas agreed.

He added that the court should reconsider other cases that fall under the precedent of the court's previous legitimate proceedings.

"Therefore, in the future, we need to revisit all the precedents of this court's substantive legitimate proceedings, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell," writes Thomas. ..

These three groundbreaking cases mentioned by Thomas, which protected access to contraception and allowed same-sex relationships and marriages, rely on the same legal reasons as Law.

At Roe, the right to personal privacy protected by the Due Process clause included the right to decide whether to give birth.

Thomas writes that "substantially legitimate process decisions are" clearly wrong. "

He added: The rights created by the litigation of our substantive legitimate process. '

' The recognized correct Roe and Casey are not independent, "writes Judges Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

"On the contrary, courts have linked it to physical integrity, family relationships, and other resolved freedoms, including childbirth, for decades, most notably pregnancy. The right to end is directly derived from the right to buy and use contraceptives. "

 

CHRISTIANS CELEBRATE A TRIUMPHANT VICTORY IN ROE VS WADE

 

Supreme Court's Roe v Wade decision powerful reminder about elections and faith

The decision on Roe by the Supreme Court proves once again that elections have consequences

By Dr. Robert Jeffress | Fox News

Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. Wade

Fox News' chief legal correspondent Shannon Bream provides details on the Supreme Court's ruling that reverses the long-standing precedent on abortion in America.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Listen to this article

0:00 / 3:04

BeyondWords

This week’s Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is the greatest judicial reversal since Brown v. Board of Education overturned racial segregation in schools. 

This is not primarily a victory for Republicans or conservatives. It is a resounding victory for millions of yet-to-be-born children who will now get to live out their God-ordained lives. 

A girl holds a pro-life sign in front of the Supreme Court after the historic ruling overturning Roe vs. Wade.  (Fox News Digital)

Friday’s ruling is a sober reminder of the 50 years of havoc that Roe v. Wade left in its wake. Sixty-three million children have been murdered in the womb since 1973. Without question abortion has been the single greatest moral stain on our nation in our history.

SUPREME COURT OVERTURNS ROE V. WADE IN LANDMARK OPINION

As momentous as the ruling in Dobbs is, however, we need to remember that this is not an outright national ban on abortion. By overturning Roe v. Wade, the Court has simply returned the authority to regulate abortion back to the state level. There will be an intense battle waged in all 50 states over this hot button issue. The pro-life cause has won an important battle, but the war is far from over. Those who value life cannot afford to become weary in well-doing.

The overturning of Roe is also an affirmation of the right and responsibility of Christians to get involved in the political process. There is only one reason Roe was overturned—in 2016, conservative Christians worked together to elect Donald Trump and President Trump kept his promise to appoint pro-life justices to the Supreme Court. Both the left and right agree that had Hillary Clinton been elected Roe would still be the law of the land today.

PENCE SAYS THE 'SANCTITY OF LIFE' WILL SPARK ‘RENEWED ENTHUSIASM’ FOR REPUBLICANS IN MIDTERMS

This week’s historic ruling is a reminder that elections have consequences. Elected leaders determine policies that can influence the moral and spiritual direction of a country. In the 1940s, German Christians (with only a few exceptions) remained silent as Adolf Hitler rose to power. 

Hundreds of people gathered outside the Supreme Court awaiting the Dobbs ruling. (Joshua Comins/Fox News)

Thankfully, Christians in our country have refused to remain silent about the genocide of unborn children. Together, they effected a leadership change that in turn resulted in a policy change that will save millions of lives.

 CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

Jesus called Christians to be both salt and light in Matthew 5. In Jesus’s day, salt was a preservative. While it couldn’t prevent the decay of meat, it could delay the decay of meat. 

Similarly, Jesus left his disciples here on Earth to delay the cultural and moral rot in our society so that we could have more time to present the hope and forgiveness Christ offers all people. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

But for salt to do its preserving work, it has to get out of the saltshaker and penetrate the meat. Thankfully, millions of Christians got out of the pews and penetrated the political world, resulting in this week’s historic Supreme Court ruling. 

Just as Christians led the way in the abolition of slavery and the fight for civil rights, Christians of this generation have been instrumental in protecting our most basic right of all---the right to life.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DR. ROBERT JEFFRESS

Dr. Robert Jeffress is pastor of the 13,000-member First Baptist Church in Dallas and a Fox News (FNC) contributor. His daily radio program “Pathway to Victory” is heard on over 1,000 stations. His weekly television program is seen in all 195 countries on more than 12,000 cable systems stations.

 

 

U.S. SUPREME COURT SENT STRONG MESSAGE TO AMERICA'S QUEERS

Supreme Court rules narrowly for Colorado baker who wouldn't make same-sex wedding cake

• The U.S. Supreme Court says the Colorado state panel violated baker's religious rights.
• The ruling was 7-2, with 2 liberals joining 5 conservatives
• The vote was narrow not because of the number of justices for and against, but because of the slim precedent it sets.

Published 6 Hours Ago Updated 2 Hours Ago Reuters

Supreme Court rules narrowly for Colorado baker who wouldn't make same-sex wedding cake   2 Hours Ago | 00:42

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory on narrow grounds to a Colorado Christian baker who refused for religious reasons to make a wedding cake for a gay couple, stopping short of setting a major precedent allowing people to claim exemptions from anti-discrimination laws based on religious beliefs.
The justices, in a 7-2 decision, said the Colorado Civil Rights Commission showed an impermissible hostility toward religion when it found that baker Jack Phillips violated the state's anti-discrimination law by rebuffing gay couple David Mullins and Charlie Craig in 2012. The state law bars businesses from refusing service based on race, sex, marital status or sexual orientation.
The ruling concluded that the commission violated Phillips' religious rights under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.
The vote was narrow not because of the number of justices for and against, but because of the slim precedent it sets.
The justices did not issue a definitive ruling on the circumstances under which people can seek exemptions from anti-discrimination laws based on their religious views. The decision also did not address important claims raised in the case including whether baking a cake is a kind of expressive act protected by the Constitution's free speech guarantee.

Supreme Court rules in favor of Colorado baker   5 Hours Ago | 01:38

Two of the court's four liberals, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, joined the five conservative justices in the ruling authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, who also was the author of the landmark 2015 decision legalizing gay marriage nationwide.
"The commission's hostility was inconsistent with the First Amendment's guarantee that our laws be applied in a manner that is neutral toward religion," Kennedy wrote.
But Kennedy also stressed the importance of gay rights while noting that litigation on similar issues is likely to continue in lower courts.
"Our society has come to the recognition that gay persons and gay couples cannot be treated as social outcasts or as inferior in dignity and worth," Kennedy wrote.

"The outcome of cases like this in other circumstances must await further elaboration in the courts, all in the context of recognizing that these disputes must be resolved with tolerance, without undue disrespect to sincere religious beliefs, and without subjecting gay persons to indignities when they seek goods and services in an open market," Kennedy added.
The case marked a test for Kennedy, who has authored significant rulings that advanced gay rights but also is a strong advocate for free speech rights and religious freedom.
Of the 50 states, 21 including Colorado have anti-discrimination laws protecting gay people.
The case pitted gay rights against religious liberty. President Donald Trump's administration intervened in the case in support of Phillips.
In a statement, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said he was "pleased" with the decision.
"The First Amendment prohibits governments from discriminating against citizens on the basis of religious beliefs," Sessions said. "The Supreme Court rightly concluded that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission failed to show tolerance and respect for Mr. Phillips' religious beliefs. In this case and others, the Department of Justice will continue to vigorously defend the free speech and religious freedom First Amendment rights of all Americans."
Mullins and Craig were planning their wedding in Massachusetts in 2012 and wanted the cake for a reception in Colorado, where gay marriage was not yet legal. During a brief encounter at Phillips' Masterpiece Cakeshop in the Denver suburb of Lakewood, the baker politely but firmly refused, leaving the couple distraught.
They filed a successful complaint with the state commission, the first step in the six-year-old legal battle. State courts sided with the couple, prompting Phillips to appeal to the top U.S. court. Phillips has said a backlash against his business has left him struggling to keep the shop afloat.
The case's outcome hinged on the actions of the Colorado commission. In one exchange at a 2014 hearing cited by Kennedy, former commissioner Diann Rice said that "freedom of religion, and religion, has been used to justify all kinds of discrimination throughout history, whether it be slavery, whether it be the Holocaust."

Openly antagonistic

Kennedy noted that the commission had ruled the opposite way in three cases brought against bakers in which the business owners refused to bake cakes containing messages that demeaned gay people or same-sex marriage.
"Government hostility toward people of faith has no place in our society, yet the state of Colorado was openly antagonistic toward Jack's religious beliefs about marriage. The court was right to condemn that," said lawyer Kristen Waggoner of the conservative Christian group Alliance Defending Freedom, which represents Phillips.
Waggoner said the decision "makes clear that the government must respect Jack's beliefs about marriage."

American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Louise Melling, who represents Mullins and Craig, said the high court made it clear that businesses open to the public must serve everyone.
"The court reversed the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision based on concerns unique to the case but reaffirmed its longstanding rule that states can prevent the harms of discrimination in the marketplace, including against LGBT people," Melling added.
The case became a cultural flashpoint in the United States, underscoring the tensions between gay rights proponents and conservative Christians.
Mullins and Craig said Phillips was using his Christian faith as pretext for unlawful discrimination based on sexual orientation. Phillips' lawyers said his cakes are an art form - a "temporary sculpture" - and being forced to create one to commemorate a gay wedding would violate his constitutional rights to free speech and expression and free exercise of religion.
The litigation, along with similar cases around the country, is part of a conservative Christian backlash to the Supreme Court's gay marriage ruling. Phillips and others like him who believe that gay marriage is not consistent with their Christian beliefs have said they should not be required to effectively endorse the practice.
Gay rights advocates said the case is just one part of a bigger struggle seeking greater legal protections for gay, bisexual and transgender people, including in the workplace, even as they fight efforts by conservatives to undermine gains secured in recent years.
CNBC's Tucker Higgins contributed to this report.

WHAT DOES GOD HAVE TO SAY TO AMERICA'S QUEERS?

Do you not know that the unrighteous and the wrongdoers will not inherit or have any share in the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived (misled): neither the impure and immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor those who participate in homosexuality, 1 CORINTHIANS 6:9