Although those who use feminine language to describe God recognize
the Bible uses male pronouns to describe him, they argue that this is
because the Bible was written in a patriarchal culture, so of course it
is going to refer to God using masculine pronouns. The authors of the
Bible, however, were not unaware of non-masculine language to describe
God, as even in ancient patriarchal societies, many cultures worshipped
female deities (see Judges 2:13, 10:6; Acts 19:27–28). It is important to remember the Bible is God-breathed (theopneustos) and, therefore, the words that are used to describe God are his own (2 Timothy 3:16).5 God is not bound by culture (1 Peter 1:24–25) as he can come in the midst of any culture and communicate his truth from Genesis to Revelation. God has chosen to reveal himself to his creation in predominately male terms (see below).
It is important to remember the Bible is God-breathed (theopneustos) and, therefore, the words that are used to describe God are his own.
Feminine Imagery to Describe God
Those who believe it is ok to describe God in feminine terms refer to
passages in the Bible that use feminine or maternal images for God: a
woman in labor (Isaiah 42:14), a nursing mother (Isaiah 49:15), a comforting mother (Isaiah 66:13), or as a mother bear (Hosea 13:8).6 In Deuteronomy 32, God, through Moses, rebukes Israel, using both male and female imagery to describe its origin:
Like an eagle that stirs up its nest, that flutters over its
young, spreading out its wings, catching them, bearing them on its
pinions, the Lord alone guided him, no foreign god was with him …You
were unmindful of the Rock that bore you, and you forgot the God who
gave you birth. (Deuteronomy 32:11–12, 18)
The female imagery used in the above passages cannot be used to conclude God is female. For example, in Deuteronomy 32:4,
God is described as “The Rock, his work is perfect…,” but no one would
suggest from this that God is a piece of marble or granite.
The female imagery used in the above passages cannot be used to conclude God is female. For example, in Deuteronomy 32:4,
God is described as “The Rock, his work is perfect…,” but no one would
suggest from this that God is a piece of marble or granite. Metaphors
are used to compare the characteristic of one thing with that of another
thing, but this does not mean the one thing (God) is the other thing (a
rock). The comparison of God to a rock expresses his power and
dependability. Deuteronomy 32:6 also says that God is Israel’s Father (ʾāb) who created them. The few passages in the Old Testament that contain feminine imagery are not meant to suggest God is female but are simply communicating truths to us about God through that imagery.
Another way people see a feminine component in God is the use of feminine nouns; such as the Hebrew word for “spirit” (rûach) and “wisdom” (ḥākmâ, Proverbs 8:1). But feminine nouns in no way mean that the spirit is a feminine person. The equivalent term in Greek for spirit, pneuma, is neuter (i.e., no gender). Moreover, in Genesis 1:2, “spirit” is modified by the masculine noun “God” (ʾĕlōhîm), just as in the New Testament (cf. Acts 5:3—4). There are even times when “spirit” (rûach) behaves as a masculine noun, especially when it occurs as part of the phrase “Spirit of the LORD” (rûaḥ YHWH) (see 2 Kings 2:16; cf. 1 Kings 18:12, 22:24).7 There is no evidence that the spirit of God is feminine.
In encouraging people to learn more about God our “Mother,” the heretical cultic group “The World Mission Society Church of God” erroneously state:
When God created human beings, He said, “Let us.” This shows that God is more than one. God created males and females as a reflection of the male and female images of God: God the Father and God the Mother.
That is why the original Hebrew text refers to God as Elohim, which means Gods. Elohim—God the Father and God the Mother—have been working together for our salvation since the creation of the world, but according to the Bible, the last days is the time for God the Mother to be revealed.
This is a classic case of reading into the Bible something that is just not there. While the Hebrew plural noun ʾĕlōhîm can refer to gods (see Exodus 12:12; 20:3), it refers to the one true God of Israel when it commonly occurs with singular verbs, as found in Genesis 1:1 (“create, bārāʾ).8 The Bible clearly affirms that there is only one God (Deuteronomy 6:4; 1 Corinthians 8:6), whose being is shared eternally by three divine persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (see Matthew 28:19; 2 Corinthians 13:14). So why use a plural noun to refer to one God? Even though Christians disagree as to the meaning of “let us”9 in Genesis 1:26, it is consistent with belief in plurality within God (Genesis 1:2; 3:22; 11:7; 18:1-3). However, the Bible nowhere states, “God the Mother.”
Further appeal to use feminine language to describe God comes from the words of Jesus in the New Testament. In Luke 15:8–10, Jesus uses a parable about a woman who searches for the lost coin. Some believe the woman represents God. Yet, the focus of the parables in Luke 15 is on rejoicing over the salvation of sinners (Luke 15:5, 6, 9, 10, 24), not on the nature of God’s being (i.e., female or not). Another example given for describing God in feminine terms comes from Jesus’
lament: “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and
stones those who are sent to it! How often would I have gathered your
children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you
were not willing” (Matthew 23:37). Jesus’ use of a feminine metaphor to compare himself to a hen who gathers her brood (as God sheltered his people, see Exodus 19:4) in no way calls us to think of him as a female (or as a hen!). Jesus was unquestionably male (see below).
While there are a number of feminine
images in the Bible used to describe God, they in no way encourage the
use of the term “mother” to describe him nor the use of feminine
pronouns when referring to him.
While there are a number of feminine images in the Bible used to describe God, they in no way encourage the use of the term “mother” to describe him nor the use of feminine pronouns when referring to him.
The Masculinity of God
The pronouns and verbs used in the Bible to describe God are always masculine, as are most of the nouns and images (Lord, King, Redeemer, Father, husband):
The Lord is slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love, forgiving iniquity and transgression, but he
will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers
on the children, to the third and the fourth generation.’ (Numbers 14:18)
Our Redeemer—the Lord of hosts is his name— is the Holy One of Israel. (Isaiah 47:4)
For
your husband is your Maker, whose name is the Lord of armies; and your
Redeemer is the Holy One of Israel, who is called the God of all the earth. (Isaiah 54:5)
Pray then like this: “Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name.” (Matthew 6:9)
Jesus said…I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and My God and your God.” (John 20:17).
For this reason I bow my knees before the Father, from whom every family in heaven and on earth is named (Ephesians 3:14–15)
he who is the blessed and only Sovereign, the King of kings and Lord of lords, (1 Timothy 6:15)
The most important name for God is the one he revealed to Moses so the people of Israel would know Moses had been sent by him:
God said to Moses, “I am who I am.” And he said, “Say this
to the people of Israel: ‘I am has sent me to you.’” God also said to
Moses, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘The Lord (יהוה), the God of
your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of
Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, and thus I am to be
remembered throughout all generations. (Exodus 3:14-15)
The covenant name יהוה (YHWH) comes from the participle form
of the verb “to be,” and there is good reason to believe it means “he
is” or “he who causes to be.”10 In the Old Testament, there are 6,828 occurrences of יהוה (YHWH), and they are always associated with masculine adjectives and masculine verbs. The name יהוה (YHWH) marks out God’s uniqueness as he is both transcendent and immanent (cf. John 1:1–3, 14). The prophet Isaiah also tells us that יהוה (YHWH) is not like the gods of the nations as he11 is pre-existent, uncreated, the Creator of all things, and the only God who can save (Isaiah 40:28, 42:5, 43:10–12).
Some may argue that it is true that God is presented as male but that
this is only metaphorical language used to describe God’s character.
Even though the modern scholarly consensus seems to suggest this latter
view is correct, it is by no means a unanimous view. Pastor and Old
Testament scholar John C. P. Smith gives several good reasons to think
this is not the case: (1) God consistently and repeatedly represents
himself as male making a deliberate assertion about his nature; (2) The
presentation of God as male throughout the Bible is ubiquitous and
supports the notion that his maleness is a reality and not a metaphor;
and (3) the term Father is not simply one metaphor among others in the Bible: it is what God in actuality is for his worshippers. 12
A further reason to see God as male is his many physical appearances
in the Bible. In the Old Testament, God appeared many times in male
human form, known as “theophanies”13 or “Christophanies” (see Genesis 18:1–3, 22, 32:22–30; Joshua 5:13–15).14
This is further affirmed in the New Testament when the Son of God
(Jesus) is presented as being male in both his pre- and
post-resurrection body (Luke 2:7, 42, 3:23, 24:36, 51). Jesus was fully God and fully man, as the apostle Paul affirmed that “in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily” (Colossians 2:9). Jesus’ gender is not something that will change, as at a fixed day in the future, he is the man who will judge the world in righteousness (Acts 17:31, cf. 17:18). From Genesis to Revelation, the Bible is consistent in teaching the maleness of God as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Nevertheless, it is argued by some that the maleness of Jesus was just culturally appropriate:
God knew that if Jesus had come to earth as a woman she
wouldn’t have been so involved in religious life, or had opportunities
to travel, or have had a voice that would be heard in the same way that a
man’s voice would. For Jesus’ ministry to be the most effective, Jesus
needed to be a man.15
The fact of Jesus’ maleness is not theologically unimportant.
If Jesus' ministry was only about being the “most effective,” then
why after his resurrection did Jesus first reveal himself to Mary
Magdalene (Luke 24:10; cf. Matthew 28:1), a woman from whom Jesus had cast seven demons (Luke 8:2)?
A woman’s testimony, especially of a former demoniac, was not highly
valued in first-century Jewish culture. This argument, however, misses
the biblical reason why Jesus came as a man. The fact of Jesus’ maleness
is not theologically unimportant.16 The reason Jesus came as a man was to stand as “the last Adam” (1 Corinthians 15:45) as the head over a new and redeemed people (cf. Romans 5:12–19). Just as the first Adam is head over a fallen humanity bringing death and condemnation (1 Corinthians 15:22; Romans 5:18), so Jesus as the “last Adam” brings justification from sin and resurrection life to a redeemed humanity (Romans 5:19; 1 Corinthians 15:22–23). It was a man who brought sin and death into the world, so it needed to be removed by a man.
The simple reason why we should not speak of God as female (i.e., “our Mother”) is that this is not the way God has chosen to reveal himself to his creation. God has chosen to reveal himself in predominately male terms and specifically as a male in the incarnation of Jesus Christ, the Son of Man, the last Adam. And that is the way we should speak to God and about God to others.
Dear viewer go to the following link and read:
No comments:
Post a Comment