Labels

Thursday, July 16, 2015

JONATHAN CAHN: AMERICA'S FALSE PROPHET OF THE 9 HARBINGERS



Jonathan Cahn's 9 harbingers were after-the-fact analysis or opinions of his own personal doing. They are not really prophecies or special revelations given to him by God's Spirit which he falsely claims. THE HARBINGER WAS A CONCEPT WHICH MR. CAHN DEVELOPED OVER A PERIOD OF 5 OR MORE YEARS WHILE MAKING MULTIPLE VISITS TO GROUND ZERO IN SEARCH OF HARBINGERS. IT WAS PREACHED BY HIM TO HIS CONGREGATION IN A FORM OF SERIES BEFORE FINALLY BEING PUBLISHED. I WAS THERE DURING THOSE YEARS TO WITNESS FIRST HAND IT'S EVOLUTION. It was all an elaborate fabrication and he successfully duped millions of Christians around the world and made a fortune in the process together with his team of religious cronies. I read the book myself and I submit my findings. EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE BELOW FOR YOURSELF:

THE HARBINGER'S 10 FATAL FLAWS

1. Hedge of protection removed/breach: pure speculation-we don't know if there is or ever has been a hedge of protection. 9/11 was not the first attack on U.S. soil, it was not a military breach, and it did not weaken America's defenses in any way.

2. The terrorist: The Assyrians were hardly the first one to use terror tactics-it is just a way to instill fear. The 9/11 hijackers were not Assyrians (which is still an ethnic group that is mostly Christian).In the Harbinger page 40 Mr. Cahn CLEARLY IMPLIES that the Ancient Assyrians were the BLOODLINE ANCESTORS of the 19 hijackers! What a blunder. THE ORIGINS OF THE 19 HIJACKERS ARE AS FOLLOW: 15 FROM SAUDI ARABIA, 2 FROM UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, 1 FROM EGYPT, & 1 FROM LEBANON(cf with wikipedia.com).

3. The fallen bricks: in Israel, fallen bricks meant the nation was leveled by the attacks. On 9/11 there were just a few square blocks of one city. In Israel, most buildings were made of bricks, while in America bricks were only incidental with no significance.

4. The tower: Completely manufactured only using the Septuagint translation, not the Hebrew(MASORETIC TEXT). If one uses the Septuagint then both the sycamore and cedar harbingers disappear. HISTORICAL FACTS REVEAL THE SEPTUAGINT VERSION IS NOT A UNIFORM AND CONSISTENT TRANSLATION. It was done by many different hands whose skills, and even philosophy of translating varied considerably. These transmission errors found in the Septuagint include the addition of words to create longer versions of some texts, most notably parts of the book of Jeremiah, and other variants that were the result of misunderstanding or misinterpreting a Hebrew word or phrase.

5. THE GAZIT STONE: Israel rebuilt using gazit (which is just quarried stone), didn't just lay a gazit cornerstone-they replaced the bricks. In America there was only a single cut cornerstone that ended up not even being used at all.
The buildings in Israel were constructed of bricks and easily destroyed when the Assyrians attacked. Israel would rebuild with much stronger quarried stone (gazit). When the tower was to be rebuilt at Ground Zero, a single quarried stone was to be placed as a cornerstone--but even that was later moved and never became a part of the new structure.

6. The sycamore: The sycamore of Israel (fig-mulberry) and that in America are two completely different kinds of trees. In Israel these fig-mulberry trees were cut down by the Assyrians all across the country. In America a single tree (that was not a fig-mulberry) just fell because of the falling buildings.

This is yet another forced parallel that does not withstand closer examination. First, the sycamore (fig-mulberry) of ancient Israel and the American sycamore are two completely different trees that are unrelated in any way. They are not the same species ( Ficus sycomorus vs. Platanus occidentalis ) . They are not in the same genus ( Ficus vs. Plantanus ), nor even in the same family ( Moraceae vs. Platanaceae ). In spite of this, the author tries to make the connection on a linguistic basis. . . .

The tree in Israel is a fruit-bearing tree, with the English translation ultimately coming from the Greek for "fig-mulberry" which is sycomoros . However, this tree is shaqam in Hebrew. So it is not legitimate to claim that this tree was a "sycamore" to the ancient Israelites, who lived long before the influence of the Greek Empire. It was a fig-mulberry--it was a shaqam to them.

In contrast, the American sycamore, as stated before, is not botanically related in any way to the fig-mulberry. There is no semantic connection. Of course, both trees carry the same name--but this is true only for English-speakers , not for Hebrew-speakers.

7. The erez: The cedar of Lebanon in Israel, but a Norway spruce in America-two completely different kinds of trees. In Israel, cedars were much stronger and much more valuable trees to be used in many different ways. But in America a single symbolic tree, that is not necessarily stronger than the tree it replaced.

Cahn's reasoning reveals that he is depending on the taxonomic classification system to make his case. The taxonomic system is based on a hierarchy of seven ranks for classifying all living things on earth.

The first problem with appealing to this classification system is that it is based exclusively on evolutionary theory. In addition, as evolutionary theory evolves, so does the classification system itself, and it can change significantly over time. . . .

The Norway spruce planted at Ground Zero is biblically a different kind of tree than the cedars of Lebanon in Isaiah:9:10. Although the Bible is not a scientific textbook, it is accurate in those matters of science about which it speaks. Consequently, based on the authority of the Word of God there is no amazing coincidence. There is no match. There is no parallel. And there is no harbinger.

8. The utterance: In Israel there was a defiant spirit directed toward the Assyrians and God, ignoring God's direct warnings by the prophets he had sent over and over to his chosen people. In America there was no intentional, prideful, arrogant defiance of God.

9. The vow: In neither case was the statement "we will rebuild" a biblical vow, it was just a statement. Beyond that, how many ways can someone say "we will rebuild?" And how many Bible verses talk about rebuilding? It is no big coincidence that Isaiah 9:10 was used (although wrongly) because what other verses could be used if someone wanted to give hope from the Bible concerning an attack that destroyed buildings? It is not like they just picked one out of 30,000 verses as Cahn says-it is basically one out of one. There is no mystery in that.

10. The Shemitah: This was only for Israel and God wiped out the country after they failed to observe the Sabbath year for almost 500 years. America is not obligated to this and what has happened in America is not the tiniest fraction of what happened to Israel. It is not even remotely close, this is most half of the book, but it is elaborately manufactured out of nothing. The Shemitah/Sabbatical Years was STRICTLY GIVEN TO THE NATION OF ISRAEL UNDER THE MOSAIC COVENANT AND TO NO OTHER NATION IN HUMAN HISTORY. In the Harbinger page 159 Jonathan Cahn claims that the Shemitah was given to America as a sign. NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH! There is absolutely no SCRIPTURAL BASIS from Genesis to Revelation which he fails to provide to validate his claims.

Cahn determines that this text in Isaiah contains a mysterious prophecy directed not to ancient Israel but to modern America. At this point the author massages /MANIPULATES Scripture, American history and current events in an attempt to prove that God's judgment on the United States has been hiding in these verses from the day they were given by Isaiah, but have now been unlocked by the careful investigation of Cahn. (IN OTHER WORDS MR. CAHN HAD TO PERFORM THEOLOGICAL GYMNASTICS BEYOND OLYMPIC PROPORTIONS IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH THIS FEAT). Nothing could be further from the truth and, even more importantly, once someone decides they can cherry-pick verses at will, change the meaning of these texts to fit his theories and use random hermeneutical methods, anything can be "proven." However, very few people will recognize what Cahn has done, and fewer still will do the hard work of investigating his interpretations.

The Harbinger, Fact or Fiction David James Interviewed Tim Berends



BELOW IS A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SPEECH MADE BY THEN SENATE MAJORITY
LEADER TOM DASCHLE TO CONGRESS ON SEPT 12TH 2001. THE VERSE IN QUESTION
ISAIAH 9:10 WAS INTENDED TO OFFER SOLACE TO A GRIEVING  NATION BY THEN
SENATOR TOM DASCHLE IN THE WAKE OF THE 9/11 TRAGEDY. HIS MOTIVES IN QUOTING THAT VERSE WAS NOT AN ACT OF DEFIANCE AGAINST GOD AS 
JONATHAN CAHN EMPHASIZES SO MUCH REPEATEDLY THROUGHOUT HIS BOOK
THE HARBINGER. IT DOESN'T TAKE A ROCKET SCIENTIST FOR ANYONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND TO CONCLUDE THAT MR. CAHN'S SO CALLED MYSTERY IN ISAIAH 9:10 
IS A  TOTAL PROPHETIC FABRICATION.


Tom Daschle Speech, 09/12/01





*EPF407 09/13/01
Text: Senate Majority Leader Daschle Expresses Sorrow, Resolve
(Vows America will rebuild, recover) (560)

Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle expressed his support on September 12 for the joint congressional resolution condemning the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington and his support for the victims and their families.

Calling the attacks "an assault on our people and our freedom," Daschle, a South Dakota Democrat, said he was outraged as an American and pained beyond words as a husband and father. His statement also included a scriptural passage from the Book of Isaiah, a poetic reference to rebuilding structures and replanting trees.

Following is the text of Daschle's statement:

(begin text)

U.S. Senate
Office of the Majority Leader
Washington, DC

September 12, 2001

Floor Statement by Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle

On a Joint Resolution of Condemnation for Yesterday's Attacks And Support for the Victims

It is with pain, sorrow, anger, and resolve that I stand before this Senate -- a symbol for 212 years of the strength of our Democracy -- and say that America will emerge from this tragedy as we have emerged from all adversity -- united and strong.

The America in which we woke today is far different from the one in which we woke yesterday. This morning, as our rescue workers and medical personnel continue their heroic work, we begin to truly understand the enormity of what has happened.

My heart aches for the people of New York, our men and women serving at the Pentagon, the passengers and crews of the four hijacked aircraft, and for their families and friends.

These attacks were an assault on our people and our freedom. They aimed at the heart of the American community, and the symbols and structures of our economic and military strength. As an American and an elected representative, I am outraged. As a husband and a father, I am pained beyond words.

Last night, we sent a message to the world that even in the face of such cowardly and heinous acts, the doors of democracy will not close.

This joint resolution we lay down today condemns yesterday's attacks, expresses our sympathy for the victims, and our support for the President as Commander-in-Chief. The world should know that the members of both parties, in both houses, stand united in this: the full resources of our government will be brought to bear in aiding the search and rescue, and in hunting down those responsible, and those who may have aided or harbored them.

Nothing can replace the losses that have been suffered. I know that there is only the smallest measure of inspiration that can be taken from this devastation. But there is a passage in the Bible, from Isaiah, that I think speaks to all of us at times like this. "The bricks have fallen down, but we will rebuild with dressed stone; the fig trees have been felled, but we will replace them with cedars."

That is what we will do. We will rebuild and we will recover. The people of America will stand together because the people of America have always stood together, and those of us who are privileged to serve this great nation will stand with you. God bless the people of America.

(end text)

(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)
NNNN

Return to Washington File Main Page 
Return to the Washington File Log

Sunday, June 28, 2015

THE HIDDEN AGENDA BEHIND THE GAY/LESBIAN MOVEMENT

THE HOMOSEXUAL MANIFESTO
from the 'History' topic
Added: 04-Jun-2007
Published: N/A

Source: The Congressional Record of the United States Cong
Author: Michael Swift
Description: 
The true attitude and motive of "gay" activists is revealed in this supposed satire by a leader of the homosexual movement.

Gay Men Marry to Rape and Molest Their Adopted Sons

]

The Kinsey Syndrome



Published on Nov 25, 2014
This documentary shows how "The Kinsey Reports" have been used to change the laws concerning sex crimes in America, resulting in the minimal sentences so often given to rapists and pedophiles. Further explained is that the Kinsey data laid the foundation for sex education -- training teachers, psychologists and even Catholic priests in human sexuality. What has been the consequence? And what was Kinsey's research really based upon?

Working secretly in his attic, Dr. Kinsey was one of America's original pornographers. His influence inspired Hugh Hefner to launch Playboy Magazine - the "soft" approach to porn - which in time would escalate the widespread use of pornography through magazines, cable TV and the Internet. In 2006 the California Child Molestation & Sexual Abuse Attorneys reported that: "The number of victims of childhood sexual abuse and molestation grows each year. This horrific crime is directly tied to the growth of pornography on the Internet."

Perhaps most disturbing, Alfred Kinsey has been accused of training pedophiles to work with stopwatches and record the responses of children being raped - all in the name of "science." Among his workers was a Nazi pedophile whose relationship to Kinsey was exposed in a German court. The information from these crimes was then recorded in "Table 34" of Kinsey's Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. How can lawmakers use such a document to define the moral parameters of our society?

Why has the truth about Kinsey been suppressed for so long? And what can Americans do to make a difference?


THE HOMOSEXUAL MANIFESTO

By Michael Swift,
"Gay Revolutionary." Reprinted from The Congressional Record of the United States Congress. First printed in Gay Community News, February 15-21 1987


"We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.

All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men. All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.

If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your
cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly
intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled. We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence--will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.

Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks."


FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THE GAY/LESBIAN HIDDEN AGENDA CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW:
  1. www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow/chapters/...
    Redeeming the Rainbow 202 THE HOMOSEXUAL MANIFESTO By Michael Swift, "GayRevolutionary." Reprinted from The Congressional Record of the United States Congress.

Saturday, June 27, 2015


What does the Bible say about homosexuality?


The Bible doesn't speak of homosexuality very often; but when it does, it condemns it as sin.  Let's take a look.
  • Lev. 18:22, "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."1
  • Lev. 20:13, "If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltness is upon them."
  • 1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10 nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
  • Rom. 1:26-28, "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27 and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. 28 And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper."
Homosexuality is clearly condemned in the Bible.  It undermines God's created order where He made Adam and Eve, a man and a woman, to carry out his command to fill and subdue the earth (Gen. 1:28). Homosexuality cannot carry out that mandate. In addition, it undermines the basic family unit of husband and wife which is the God-ordained means of procreation.  And, believe it or not, it is also dangerous to society. (See, Is homosexuality dangerous?)
Unlike other sins, homosexuality has a heavy judgment administered by God Himself upon those who commit it and support it. This judgment is that those who practice it are given over to their passions and believe its lie, which means that their hearts are allowed to be hardened by their sins.
"For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27 and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error," (Romans 1:26-27).
As a result, they can no longer see the error of what they are doing, will not seek forgiveness, and will not repent.  They will die in their sins and face God's righteous condemnation. 
But their rebellion against God does not stop there.  Those thus judged also promote it and condemn others who don't approve of their behavior.
"...and, although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them," (Rom. 1:32).
So, in their "hearty approval" of homosexuality, they encourage others to accept their practice; and thus their sin spreads.  In this, they will reject the ways of God and stand in opposition to Christ's redemptive work on the cross.  Without Jesus, they will have no forgiveness.  Without forgiveness, they will have no salvation. Without salvation, there is only damnation in eternalHell.  We don't want this for anyone.

Is this politically correct?

No, the Bible's view of homosexuality is not politically correct.  Society says that there is nothing wrong with two people "just loving each other."  They ask who are we Christians to judge them?  But, we ask who are they to say what is morally right and wrong?  Do they have an objective standard of morals that all people should follow?  No, they don't.  They appeal to things like "society" and "common sense" and "basic rights," to promote their opinion of homosexual normality.  The problem is that societies have been wrong before (Nazi Germany, anyone?).  What is common sense to one person isn't necessarily common sense to another.  And, basic rights?  Well, we all have basic rights.  But, the homosexuals want special rights.  They want laws passed to protect their sexual behavior. They also want to redefine marriage and have everyone else to accept it.
Will the redefinition stop with homosexual marriage? Don't bet on it. Pedophiles are now asking for rights, too, and they are using the same arguments initially presented by the homosexual movement decades ago2).
Think about it. The pro-homosexuals want laws passed to protect a behavior.  It is, after all, homoSEXuality. I want to know what right do the politically correct, pro-homosexual minority have to impose their values on the majority? What right do they have to condemn Christians, call us names (homophobes, bigots, etc), and be so very intolerant when we say their behavior is a sinful? They don't have sound arguments.  But they do have emotional ones fueled by liberal dogmatism. They are successfully getting homosexuality promoted in schools, TV, and movies as "normal" and healthy.  Healthy?  Check out the health statistics of homosexual behavior.  As a result, their confidence and successes have pumped up their bravado so much that they even oppress those who oppose homosexuality, a fact blatently ignored by the double-standard-liberal-media.  But what are we to expect when dogmatism is king and all opposing views are condemned? The pro-homosexuals want everyone to think like them and approve of their "inborn sexual orientation"; and if you don't, well, then you're labeled a bigot--and worse!  What they want is for everyone to think that homosexuality is normal.  After all, it exists in the animal world, doesn't it?  Yes, it does, and so does eating their young and canibilism.  Just because animals do it, doesn't make it morally right.
But, believe it or not.  We, Christians, aren't judging homosexuals.  We are informing them.  God has declared that homosexuality is a sin.  It isn't our preferences we're declaring.  It is God's.  I know.  I know.  Some will say the Bible isn't true, that it is archaic, sexist, homophobic, etc.  I've heard it all before.  Kill the messenger and let's all jump into bed together and have our fun. Sorry, I'm not interested in freedom without responsibility and the resulting promiscuity and diseases and oppression that accompany the politically correct, sexually promiscuity of liberal morality.  Instead, I'll follow my Lord who calls all to repentance (Acts 17:30), myself included.

Homosexuality is a sexual orientation

Homosexuals will say that they are born the way they are, that it is a genetic orientation, and since they didn't choose it, it cannot be wrong.  If that is the case, then why do identical twins, with identical genetics, not have uniformity of sexual orientation?  This proves it is not genetic.3  But let's not stop there.  What if I am born with a genetic orientation to dislike homosexuality?  Is that okay?  If it is not, then why the double standard?  Would it then be okay for me to want laws passed to protect my "homosexuality aversion orientation"?  Or, is only their orientation worthy of protection? 
Just being born with an orientation doesn't mean it is okay.  If I am born with the orientation to lie, does it mean lying is okay?  Of course not.  Should I demand national rights granted to me because of my lying orientation and its resulting practice?  Again, of course not. (See What is sexual orientation?)

What is the homosexual's hope?

The only hope for the homosexual and all people who break God's laws is to realize that God is holy, and He will rightfully judge all who have sinned against Him by breaking his law (1 Kings 8:32; Ps. 9:8; 1 John 3:4).  If He did not do this, then He would be approving of wrong doing.  However, God is loving (1 John 4:8), patient (Rom. 2:4), wants people to repent (Acts 17:30) and desires that we come a saving knowledge of Him.  What this means is that the sinner must turn to Christ, who is God the Son in flesh (John 1:1, 14; Col. 2:9), who bore our sins in His body on the cross (1 Pet. 2:24), died and rose from the dead (1 Cor. 15:1-4), and made it possible for sinners to be saved from the righteous judgment of God, by faith in what Jesus did on our behalf (2 Cor. 5:21), so they can be forgiven of their sins (Eph. 2:8).  This is done by receiving Christ (John 1:12), by believing in Him and accepting His sacrifice that is a payment for our sins to God the Father.  Like any sinner, the homosexual needs to repent, receive Christ by faith, and be saved from God's righteous judgment by trusting in Christ and the judgment that fell upon Him on the cross.  They need to pray and ask the Lord Jesus to save them.

What should be the Christian's response to the Homosexual?

Just because someone is a homosexual, does not mean that we cannot love him (or her) or pray for him (or her).  Homosexuality is a sin and like any other sin, it needs to be laid at the cross and forsaken. 
Please understand that I don't hate homosexuals.  I wouldn't care if my neighbor is gay.  I've had homosexual friends and have loved them the same as I would anyone else.  I was their friend, yet they knew I did not approve of their behavior.  But, the Bible says homosexuality is a sin, and the solution to the problem of sin (the breaking of God's Law, 1 John 3:4) is found only in Jesus.  He is the Lord, the Savior, the risen King. Jesus is God in flesh (John 1:1, 14), and He died to save sinners from God the Father's righteous judgment.  We are all sinners, and we all need salvation (Eph. 2:8-9) that is only found in receiving Christ (John 1:12-13).
We Christians should pray for the salvation of the homosexual the same as we would for anyone else.  This is not an issue of arrogance or judgmentalism. We don't want anyone to be lost due to their sin and that includes gays, lesbians, and transgenders.
The homosexual is still made in the image of God, even though he (or she) is in rebellion against Him.  Therefore, we Christians should show homosexuals the same dignity as anyone else with whom we come in contact.  Don't injure them.  Don't hate them.  Don't judge them.  Inform them that freedom and forgiveness are found in Jesus.  Let them know that God loves us and died for us so that we might be delivered from the consequences of our sin - which is eternal separation from God (Isaiah 59:2).
But, this does not mean that we are to approve of what they do.  We are not to compromise our witness for a socially acceptable opinion that is void of rationality, godliness, and biblical truth.  Instead, stand firm in the Word that God has revealed to us and patiently love him/her biblically and pray for their salvation.  Be kind to them.  Be loving.  And, when appropriate, tell them the Gospel because forgiveness of our sins is found in Christ.

Friday, June 26, 2015

Supreme Court gay marriage ruling a potential threat to religious freedom?

 WE JUST WITNESSED TODAY THE BIRTH OF A NEW NATION.
WELCOME TO THE NEW AMERICA. THE UNITED STATES OF SODOM & GOMORRAH.
THE 9 JUSTICES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT HAVE JUST OPENED A PANDORA'S BOX!
WATCH THE FOLLOWING 2 VIDEOS BELOW AND THE CORRESPONDING ARTICLE.



The Homosexual Agenda and the Normalisation of Sexual Perversion




Paul  Flynn looks at the growing momentum of the Homosexual movement as it seeks to impose their form of morality on the rest of society. How should Christians react to this? What are the roots of the Homosexual movement? How did views towards homosexuality change in the 20th century? What views are changing in academia towards sexuality? Is it possible that University academics are also promoting pedophilia? Who was Alfred Kinsey and how does he influence modern views on sexuality?

ISAIAH 5:20:
20Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness, who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

Question: "Why is God going to send a strong delusion in the end times?"

Answer:
The Bible makes it clear why God is sending a strong delusion in the end times: “They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness” (2 Thessalonians 2:10-12). Simply put, God sends a strong delusion to those who chose not to believe the gospel of Christ. Those who take delight in mocking and rejecting Him, He will condemn.


It is man’s choice whether to accept and believe the truth of Jesus Christ as presented in the Scriptures. To receive the truth and the love God offers is in keeping with its teachings, “This is love for God: to obey His commands” (1 John 5:3). Conversely, to know the truth and not obey it is to face the wrath of God: “The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness” (Romans 1:18). Frankly speaking, there is no more dangerous condition for man than to know the truth and refuse to obey it. To do so is to harden the heart and make God’s condemnation sure.

When one knows the truth and refuses to obey it, he is subject to any lie, any deception, any untruth that man can conjure up. “For although they knew God, they neither glorified Him nor gave thanks to Him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools” (Romans 1:21-22). Paul goes on in next few verses to describe the mindset and behaviors of those who disbelieve (seeRomans 1:29-31). As a result of man’s foolishness and his arrogant disdain of the things of God, “God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done” (Romans 1:28). And correspondingly, “Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things, but also approve of those who practice them” (Romans 1:32).

Isaiah puts it succinctly: “They have chosen their own ways, and their souls delight in their abominations; so I [God] also will choose harsh treatment for them and bring upon them what they dread. For when I called, no one answered, when I spoke, no one listened. They did evil in My sight and chose what displeases Me” (Isaiah 66:3-4).

When men know the truth and refuse to receive it, when they refuse to obey it and hold it in unrighteousness, “they will be condemned for enjoying evil rather than believing the truth” (2 Thessalonians 2:12 NLT).

“God is love” (1 John 4:16). He is not some cruel monster who deliberately and inwardly delights in preparing people for everlasting condemnation. But He earnestly and lovingly proclaims the gospel of Christ, “not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9).

Throughout the Scriptures, God urges people to accept the truth. But when people reject Him and spurn His message, then—and not until then—God hardens them and turns them over to a deluded mind to wallow in their wickedness to their eternal damnation. This is what the Lord says about those who choose to reject the truth: “They greatly love to wander; they do not restrain their feet. So the Lord does not accept them; He will now remember their wickedness and punish them for their sins” (Jeremiah 14:10).


The following is an excerpt taken from the book" "STORM WARNING 
THE COMING PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS AND TRADITIONALIST IN AMERICA
BY DON McALVANY PUBLISHED 1999 HEARTHSTONE PUBLISHING:

ATTACKING CHRISTIANS IN THE LEGAL ARENA PAGE #234

"New legal initiatives which are now being pushed throughout our leftist-dominated legal system and which will put Christians and traditionalist on a collision course with the government and the new anti-christian consensus include: 1) euthanasia 2)HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGES 3) greater government involvement in child raising and decisions regarding children's education and careers as per HILLARY CLINTON'S BOOK "IT TAKES A VILLAGE" 4) government registration and tracking of all children from day one to death
5) NEW HATE CRIME LEGISLATION which will make it a federal crime to criticize a HOMOSEXUAL or their lifestyle or to oppose abortionist 6) new anti-discrimination legislation which will make it a federal crime not to hire a homosexual or have up to a 10% quota of homosexuals working for a business or MINISTRY; new anti-terrorist legislation which will make it illegal to criticize the government, to pray or demonstrate in front of an abortion clinic, and much more.
  Many practicing Christians( fundamentalist, Catholic, and Pentecostals) will have a major problem with these initiatives-the ones already in place and the ones which will be adopted over the next few years. So the liberal U.S. legal system  and the Christian Traditionalist are on a unavoidable collision course. The more the Christian Traditionalist oppose these unbiblical and unconstitutional  measures, the more they will be isolated, slandered, ostracized, marginalized, and ULTIMATELY TARGETED FOR PERSECUTION by the liberal power structure and the new ANTI-CHRISTIAN CONSENSUS. This is the way the pressure began to build against the Jews in Nazi Germany during the 1930s.

A NEW LEGAL STRUCTURE TO PROTECT HOMOSEXUALS  PAGE #244:

Special protection for HOMOSEXUALS has some frightening implications. When homosexuals become a protected class of citizens, they will be entitled not only to special treatment, but also to extraordinary rights-one of which will be a government guarantee of legal SAME SEX MARRIAGE. The ramifications for Christian churches and organizations are ominous. 
     For a clergy to REFUSE TO MARRY A HOMOSEXUAL COUPLE will be a civil rights/criminal violation punishable by fines, imprisonment, or a court ordered ban from ministry. Clergy who refuse to officiate such unions believing it violates Scripture will be denounced as hateful, bigoted, or even guilty of a HATE CRIME. Many clergy in the former Soviet Union, Red China, Cuba and other communist countries have been officially banned from the ministry, have suffered civil penalties, imprisonment, exile or execution for refusing to obey compulsory anti-biblical measures.
    Under the coming special protection for homosexuals, A CHURCH, MINISTRY OR BUSINESS WHICH REFUSES TO HIRE A HOMOSEXUAL or hire them in the ratio of 10% will be guilty of a civil and criminal civil rights violation.
      So Christians and Traditionalist in America who oppose abortion and the practice of homosexuality, WHO SPEAK OR WRITE OPPOSITION, who take overt action to stop these practices, or who TEACH THEIR CHILDREN THAT THEY ARE WRONG, COULD SOON BE DECLARED AS CRIMINALS, SHADES OF NAZI GERMANY AND COMMUNIST RUSSIA AND CHINA!

The above quotations is just the tip of the iceberg of the DRACONIAN LAWS which are/will go into affect in America in the near future. Mr. McAlvany has a background in intelligence work. He made these predictions back in 1999 with STUNNING ACCURACY. His book is a MUST READ for all CHRISTIANS IN AMERICA NOW MORE THAN EVER in light of this landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court which was reached today. Mr. McAlvany clearly reveals how all of this was in the planning process many years ago. And there is more to come. 
THE POLITICAL LEFT IS SETTING UP THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT FOR A MASSIVE PERSECUTION IN A COMING SOCIALIST AMERICA!


Satanic Temple: Gay Marriage is 'a Sacrament’

Satanic Temple: Gay Marriage is 'a Sacrament’

  1. Welcome to Rabbi Kris Kringle's Jew Watch: March 2015

    seraphimre.blogspot.com/2015_03_01_archive.html
    Mar 31, 2015 · PROPHECIES CONCERNING THE FALL OF AMERICA- Dumitru Duduman . Dumitru Duduman Invasion of America. ... Rabbi Kris Kringle at 3:00 …




  1. Storm Warning, Updated Edition: Don McAlvany: …

    www.amazon.com/Storm-Warning-Updated-Edition-McAlvany/dp/B0016N2CKG
    • By Don McAlvany · 
    •      
    • Paperback
     ..