Thursday, August 25, 2022

Deconstructing Atheist Kristi Burke's unbelief in God


Is there evidence for the existence of God?

There is evidence for the existence of God. Not everyone finds that evidence compelling or convincing; this does not mean such evidence is nonexistent. Most who deny evidence for God demand forms of proof—or levels of certainty—that are either irrelevant or unreasonable. Looking at logic, experience, and empirical observations, there is much evidence for the existence of God.

Assessing evidence includes properly categorizing it. Some balk at the idea of “evidence” for a God who is invisible and immaterial. However, even hardened skeptics accept the meaningful existence of many such things, such as the laws of logic. Logic is neither material nor visible, yet it’s legitimately considered “real” and can be both perceived and examined. One cannot see logic or mechanically quantify it, but this does not justify any useful claim that logic does not exist. The same is true, to varying degrees, with other concepts such as morality.

This point also establishes that logic and philosophy are relevant when discussing evidence for the existence of God. As demonstrated in the case of the laws of logic, even if empirical proof is unconvincing, that does not mean the subject in question cannot be “real.” The probability that God exists is in no way reduced simply because empirical evidence is subject to interpretation; it is at least possible that something intangible, non-material, and meaningful actually exists.

With that in mind, there are several broad categories of evidence for the existence of God. None are self-sufficient to prove that God exists or that the Bible’s description of Him is accurate. Combined, however, they form a compelling argument that the God described in Scripture is real.

Human beings have a natural “sense” of God. Historians and anthropologists alike recognize belief in some supernatural reality as common to almost all human beings who have ever lived. The number of people who categorically reject every form of higher power or spirit is vanishingly small. This is true even in profoundly “secular” cultures. Even further, secular fields of study such as cognitive science of religion suggest that such beliefs are ingrained in the natural state of the human mind. At the very least, this suggests there is something real to be perceived, just as senses like sight and hearing are targeted at actual phenomena.

Logic points to the existence of God. There are several logic-based arguments indicating that God exists. Some, like the ontological argument, are not considered especially convincing, though they’re hard to refute. Others, such as the kalam cosmological argument, are considered much more robust. Continuing along the same spectrum, concepts such as intelligent design—teleological arguments—make logical inferences from observations to argue for the existence of God.

General observations support the existence of God. Teleological arguments arise because so many aspects of reality appear to be deliberately arranged. That evidence, in and of itself, is often extremely indicative of a Creator. The Big Bang is a classic example. This theory was initially resisted by atheists for being too “religious.” And yet the idea of a non-eternal universe, as demonstrated by secular science, is strongly supportive of the claims made in the early chapters of the Bible.

History, literature, and archaeology support the existence of God. Whether critics like it or not, the Bible is a valid form of evidence for the existence of God. Not merely “because the Bible says so,” but because the Bible has proved to be so reliable. Dismissing it as biased, simply because it says things skeptics do not accept, is not a rational response. That would be as irrational as dismissing every book describing Julius Caesar and then claiming there are no records describing Julius Caesar. The reliability of the Bible and its coordination with secular history and archaeology are reasonable points to raise when it comes to discussing the existence of God.

Personal experiences support the existence of God. Obviously, these are compelling only for those particular persons. Yet many people have come to know and understand God in a deeply personal way. So far as those experiences coordinate with other evidence, they’re reasonable to consider as part of the evidence for the existence of God.

Evidence will never overcome obstinance. Perhaps the weakest response to evidence of God’s existence is ignoring it: claiming “there is no evidence.” Closely related is the suggestion that a skeptic finds the evidence uncompelling. This kind of claim often comes with an ever-shifting threshold for proof. As happened with the Big Bang Theory, even when a position is effectively “proved,” the committed skeptic can always pivot to claim that this proof actually supports his fundamental views. Just as one person’s belief is not hard evidence regarding God’s existence, one person’s disbelief is not hard evidence of the opposite. This is especially true given that God’s existence touches on issues like personal morality and autonomy. Both in Scripture and in daily life, it’s common to see examples of those presented with more than enough evidence, yet who choose to stubbornly ignore it (Romans 1:18–20Psalm 19:1John 5:39–40Luke 16:19–31James 2:19).

Combining what we know of experience, logic, history, science, and other disciplines, there is more than enough evidence that God exists. Thankfully, we aren’t expected to find all that evidence in order to have a right relationship with Him. Rather, we are obligated to absorb what we can see and understand and follow the process of “ask . . . seek . . . knock” (Matthew 7:7–8).
 

 
 
 
 

Wednesday, August 24, 2022

What is The Mathematical Probability that Jesus of Nazareth is the Christ?







The reason why prophecy is an indication of the divine authorship of the Scriptures, and hence a testimony to the trustworthiness of the Message of the Scriptures, is because of the minute probability of fulfillment.

Anyone can make predictions. Having those prophecies fulfilled is vastly different. In fact, the more statements made about the future, and the more the detail, then the less likely the precise fulfillment will be. For example, what’s the likelihood of a person predicting today the exact city in which the birth of a future leader would take place, well into the 22nd century? This is indeed what the prophet Micah did 700 years before the Messiah. Further, what is the likelihood of predicting the precise manner of death that a new unknown religious leader would experience, a thousand years from now – a manner of death presently unknown, and to remain unknown for hundreds of years? Yet, this is what David did in 1000 B.C. Again, what is the likelihood of predicting the specific date of the appearance of some great future leader, hundreds of years in advance? This is what Daniel did, 530 years before Christ.

If one were to conceive 50 specific prophecies about a person in the future, whom one would never meet, just what’s the likelihood that this person will fulfill all 50 of the predictions? How much less would this likelihood be if 25 of these predictions were about what other people would do to him, and were completely beyond his control? For example, how does someone “arrange” to be born in a specific family? How does one “arrange” to be born in a specified city, in which their parents don’t actually live? How does one “arrange” their own death – and specifically by crucifixion, with two others, and then “arrange” to have their executioners gamble for His clothing (John 16;19; Psalms 22:18)? How does one “arrange” to be betrayed in advance? How does one “arrange” to have the executioners carry out the regular practice of breaking the legs of the two victims on either side, but not their own? How does one escape from a grave and appear to people after having been killed? Indeed, it may be possible for someone to fake one or two of the Messianic prophecies, but it would be impossible for any one person to arrange and fulfill all of these prophecies.

The science of probability attempts to determine the chance that a given event will occur. A professor at Westmont College, has calculated the probability of one man fulfilling the major prophecies made concerning the Messiah. The estimates were worked out by twelve different classes representing some 600 university students. The students carefully weighed all the factors, discussed each prophecy at length, and examined the various circumstances which might indicate that men had conspired together to fulfill a particular prophecy. They made their estimates conservative enough so that there was finally unanimous agreement even among the most skeptical students. However the professor then took their estimates, and made them even more conservative. He also encouraged other skeptics or scientists to make their own estimates to see if his conclusions were more than fair.

Finally, he submitted his figures for review to a committee of the American Scientific Affiliation. Upon examination, they verified that his calculations were dependable and accurate in regard to the scientific material presented. For example, concerning Micah 5:2, where it states the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem, the professor and his students determined the average population of BETHLEHEM from the time of Micah to the present; then they divided it by the average population of the earth during the same time period. They concluded that the chance of one man being born in Bethlehem was one in 300,000.

After examining only eight different prophecies, they conservatively estimated that the chance of one man fulfilling all eight prophecies was one in 10^17. To illustrate how large the number 10^17 is (a figure with 17 zeros), the professor gave this illustration: If you mark one of ten tickets, and place all the tickets in a hat, and thoroughly stir them, and then ask a blindfolded man to draw one, his chance of getting the right ticket is one in ten. Suppose that we take 10^17 silver dollars and lay them on the face of Texas. They’ll cover all of the state two feet deep. Now mark one of these silver dollars and stir the whole mass thoroughly, all over the state. Blindfold a man and tell him that he can travel as far as he wishes, but he must pick up the one silver dollar that has the special mark on it. What chance would he have of getting the right one? Just the same chance that the prophets would’ve had of writing these eight prophecies and having them all come true in any one man, from their day to the present time.

In financial terms, is there anyone who would not invest in a financial venture if the chance of failure were only one in 10^17? This is the kind of sure investment we’re offered by God for faith in His Messiah.

From these figures, the professor concludes the fulfillment of these eight prophecies alone proves that God inspired the writing of the prophecies – the likelihood of mere chance is only one in 10^17. Another way of saying this is that any person who minimizes or ignores the significance of the biblical identifying signs concerning the Messiah would be foolish.

But, of course, there are many more than eight prophecies. In another calculation, the professor used 48 prophecies (even though he could have used Edersheim’s 456), and arrived at the extremely conservative estimate that the probability of 48 prophecies being fulfilled in one person is the incredible number 10^157. How large is 10^157? 10^157 contains 157 zeros!

The professor gives an illustration of this number using electrons. Electrons are very small objects. They’re smaller than atoms. It would take 2.5 TIMES 10^15 of them, laid side by side, to make one inch. Even if we counted 250 of these electrons each minute, and counted day and night, it would still take 19 million years just to count a line of electrons one inch long. With this introduction, let’s go back to our chance of one in 10^157. Let’s suppose that we’re taking this number of electrons, marking one, and thoroughly stirring it into the whole mass, then blindfolding a man and letting him try to find the right one. What chance has he of finding the right one? What kind of a pile will this number of electrons make? They make an inconceivably large volume.

This is the result from considering a mere 48 prophecies. Obviously, the probability that 456 prophecies would be fulfilled in one man by chance is vastly smaller. Once one goes past one chance 10^50, the probabilities are so small that it is impossible to think that they will ever occur.

As the professor concludes, “Any man who rejects Christ as the Son of God is rejecting a fact, proved perhaps more absolutely than any other fact in the world.” 

Monday, August 15, 2022

Jesus was not White says the Bible. False claims by Tik Toker MFLORES EXPOSED!


TIK TOKER AND ATHEIST MFLORES 4823 IN THIS VIDEO ASSERTS  THAT JESUS OF NAZARETH WAS NOT WHITE. BELOW I PROVIDE HISTORICAL AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE REFUTING THESE CLAIMS. THIS IS BASED ON AN AFRO-CENTRIC VIEW FROM ELIJAH MUHAMMAD THE RADICAL CULT LEADER OF THE NATION OF ISLAM.
 
THEN PERHAPS THE VIDEO BELOW REPRESENTS A MORE ACCURATE RENDITION OF ELIJAH MUHAMMAD'S BLACK VERSION OF JESUS
 
 
BELOW YOU WILL FIND SEVERAL LINKS REFUTING THESE BLACK FABLES. THE EVIDENCE IS VERY EXTENSIVE SO PLEASE TRY NOT TO ALLOW YOURSELF TO BE OVERWHELMED BY IT.

 
 


THE YOUNG BLACK STUDENT SPEAKING IN THIS TIK TOK VIDEO IS A DISCIPLE OF ELIJAH MUHAMMAD THE FOUNDER OF THE NATION OF ISLAM A RADICAL BLACK ISLAMIC MOVEMENT. HERE ARE SOME IMPORTANT FACTS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS ISLAMIC BLACK CULT:

9 Things You Should Know About the Nation of Islam

In a video that has been viewed nearly 2 million times on Facebook, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan said, “I know that my redeemer liveth. I know. I’m not guessing that my Jesus is alive.” This clip has lead some people to wonder if Farrakhan has become a closet Christian, but other people more familiar with the Nation of Islam’s teachings have pointed out that the use of such language is nothing new.

Here is what you should know about the controversial religious group known as the Naiton of Islam.

1. The Nation of Islam (NOI) is an African-American movement and organization that combines elements of traditional Islam with black nationalist ideas and race-based theology. Although the group is rather small (estimated membership is between 20,000 and 50,000 people), Farrakhan has used the organization to leverage his influence within the African-American community. In 1995 he organized and was the keynote speaker for the Million Man March, a gathering in Washington, D.C., that attracted 400,000 people.

2. The NOI was founded in Detroit on July 4, 1930, by Wallace D. Fard (a.k.a. Wallace Fard Muhammad). Fard worked as a door-to-door salesman before gaining a following in the black community as a religious leader. In 1931, Fard met a migrant worker named Elijah Poole (aka Elijah Muhammad) and for the next three and a half years he reportedly “taught and trained the Honorable Elijah Muhammad night and day into the profound Secret Wisdom of the Reality of God.” The NOI considers Fard to be the Messiah of Judaism, the Mahdi of Islam (the prophesied redeemer of Islam), as “Allah in the flesh,” and “the second coming of Jesus, the Christ, Jehovah, God, and the Son of Man.” Fard mysteriously disappeared in 1934. He was last seen by Elijah Muhammad and was never heard from again.

3. Elijah Muhammad took over leadership of Fard’s group in Detroit and changed the name from the Allah Temple of Islam to Nation of Islam. For the next 41 years, until his death in 1975, Elijah Muhammad served as a mentor to some influential African Americans (most notably Malcolm X and Muhammad Ali), grew the small group into a large movement, developed many NOI-owned businesses and schools, and created the largest African-American newspaper in the United States. At the height of his power, the NOI is estimated to have had 250,000 members.

4. Under Elijah Muhammad’s leadership, the NOI grew to be an influential, controlling, and intimidating organization. Malcolm X had once been a protégé of the religious leader but was suspended from the NOI because Elijah Muhammad believed he was becoming too influential. A year later, Malcolm X was shot to death by NOI members while speaking at a rally in New York City. Another former student, Cassius Clay (a.k.a. Muhammad Ali), reportedly refused to be drafted into the U.S. military out of fear of being killed by Elijah Muhammad (who opposed the draft and had avoided it himself). In the 1970s Ali told reporter Dave Kindred : “I would have gotten out of [the Nation of Islam] a long time ago, but you saw what they did to Malcolm X. . . . I can’t leave the Muslims. They’d shoot me, too.”

5. A day after Elijah Muhammad’s death, his son Warith Deen Mohammed was declared the new leader of the NOI. Over the next few years, Warith changed the organization’s name to the American Society of Muslims and attempted to make it a more orthodox Islamic movement. In 1981, a protégé of Elijah, Louis Farrakhan (nee Louis Wolcott), started a new group, took back the name “Nation of Islam,” and worked to restore the original movement of Elijah Muhammed. Under Farrakhan’s leadership, the movement shifted back to its cultish religious beliefs and readopted racist and anti-Semitic views.

6. In 2010, Farrakhan publicly announced his embrace of cult leader L. Ron Hubbard’s teachings known as “Dianetics.” Although claiming he wasn’t a Scientologist, Farrakhan actively encouraged Nation of Islam members to undergo auditing from the Church of Scientology. “I’ve found something in the teaching of Dianetics, of Mr. L. Ron Hubbard, that I saw could bring up from the depth of our subconscious mind things that we would prefer to lie dormant,” he told his Chicago congregation. “How could I see something that valuable and know the hurt and sickness of my people and not offer it to them?” In 2011 he added, “All white people should flock to L. Ron Hubbard. You can still be a Christian; you just won’t be a devil Christian. You can still be a Jew, but you won’t be a satanic Jew.”

6. The NOI has an all-male paramilitary wing known as the Fruit of Islam (F.O.I). As one NOI website explains,

The responsibility of the F.O.I. is that of a head of house: protection, provision, and maintenance of the Nation of Islam (all Original People). The F.O.I. are militant in the sense that our operations are done as a unit (Latin: mili – meaning “one”). He is a soldier. Soldier has a root, again Latin, solidus, meaning solid. “Belong” means “to be owned by”. An F.O.I. is respectful to all regardless of color, class, or creed. He is honest, and hardworking, never considering crime as an alternative nor encroaching on another man’s right to peace and property.

The F.O.I. is sometimes confused with the Five-Percent Nation (aka Five Percenters), a splinter group that separated from NOI in the 1960s.

7. The NOI asserts that white people were created through scientific experimentation by a scientist named Yakub. As Farrakhan has explained, “the Bible calls him ‘Jacob,’ who wrestled with The Angel, and prevailed, and his name was changed from “Jacob” to Israel). He was a great Black Scientist.” Yakub supposedly began a program of selective breeding that was carried out by his followers after his death and resulted in the creation of the “white race.” This race became famous for corrupting and enslaving other races. As Farrakhan says, “the white race is a race of devils.”

8. Since its founding the NOI has frequently been accused of spreading anti-Semitic propaganda and promoting anti-Jewish conspiracy theories. For example, as the Anti-Defamation League notes, Farrakhan has “repeatedly alleged that the Jewish people were responsible for the slave trade and that they conspire to control the government, the media, Hollywood, and various Black individuals and organizations to this day.” In a prominent address in 2015, Farrakhan claimed Israel and Jews orchestrated the 9/11 attacks, that “Israelis had foreknowledge of the attacks,” and that Jews were warned ahead of time not to come to work that day.

9. The NOI advocates for racial separatism. As outlined in “The Muslim Program” the movement wants to establish a “separate state or territory of their own–either on this continent or elsewhere.” The group believes “our former slave masters are obligated to provide such land and that the area must be fertile and minerally rich [sic]. We believe that our former slave masters are obligated to maintain and supply our needs in this separate territory for the next 20 to 25 years–until we are able to produce and supply our own needs.” Until such time as they are allowed to create their own separate nation, the NOI wants segregated schools, exemption from all taxation, a prohibition on intermarriage or race mixing, and to have “the religion of Islam taught without hindrance or suppression.”



Friday, August 12, 2022

KRISTI BURKE CLAIMS THAT ADAM & EVE WHERE SET UP? DECONSTRUCTING THIS MALARKEY


 The following is a sound Biblical response to this mind boggling question:

Why did God put the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden of Eden? ANSWER God put the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden of Eden to give Adam and Eve a choice to obey Him or disobey Him. Adam and Eve were free to do anything they wanted, except eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Genesis 2:16-17, “And the LORD God commanded the man, ‘You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die.’” If God had not given Adam and Eve the choice, they would have essentially been robots, simply doing what they were programmed to do. God created Adam and Eve to be “free” beings, able to make decisions, able to choose between good and evil. In order for Adam and Eve to truly be free, they had to have a choice. There was nothing essentially evil about the tree or the fruit of the tree. It is unlikely that the fruit, in and of itself, gave Adam and Eve any further knowledge. That is, the physical fruit may have contained some vitamin C and some beneficial fiber, but it was not spiritually nutritious. However, the act of disobedience was spiritually deleterious. That sin opened Adam’s and Eve’s eyes to evil. For the first time, they knew what it was to be evil, to feel shame, and to want to hide from God. Their sin of disobeying God brought corruption into their lives and into the world. Eating the fruit, as an act of disobedience against God, was what gave Adam and Eve the knowledge of evil—and the knowledge of their nakedness (Genesis 3:6–7). God did not want Adam and Eve to sin. God knew ahead of time what the results of sin would be. God knew that Adam and Eve would sin and would thereby bring evil, suffering, and death into the world. Why, then, did God allow Satan to tempt Adam and Eve? God allowed Satan to tempt Adam and Eve in order for them to prove their loyalty and love towards God. YOU MAY BE THINKING NOW WAIT A MINUTE! THAT WAS AN ENTRAPMENT BUT IT WAS NOT. Adam and Eve chose, of their own free will, to disobey God and eat the forbidden fruit. The same is true today with the human race. Many who even profess to know God are walking in disobedience towards Him deliberately out of their own free will. GOD NEVER FORCES ANYONE AT ANYTIME FOR THEM TO WILLFULLY DISOBEY HIM! Another example of God not forcing anyone to sin is found in Genesis 4: 1-7. God warned Cain that sin was crouching at the door because he was jealous of his younger brother Abel's offering to God. God encouraged Cain to seek peace with his brother. But instead Cain of his own free will disobeyed God and committed the first homicide recorded in human history. What has been the consequences of Adam & Eve disobedience? The results—evil, sin, suffering, sickness, and death—have plagued the world ever since. Adam and Eve’s decision results in every person being born with a sin nature, a tendency to sin. Adam and Eve’s decision is what ultimately required Jesus Christ to die on the cross and shed His blood on our behalf. Through faith in Christ, we can be free from sin’s consequences, and ultimately free from sin itself. May we echo the words of the Apostle Paul in Romans 7:24-25, “What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? Thanks be to God—through Jesus Christ our Lord!” In conclusion if you are still doubtful about God's role in all of this, then here is his answer to you: James 1:13-15 New Life Version God Does Not Tempt Us 13 When you are tempted to do wrong, do not say, “God is tempting me.” God cannot be tempted. He will never tempt anyone. 14 A man is tempted to do wrong when he lets himself be led by what his bad thoughts tell him to do. 15 When he does what his bad thoughts tell him to do, he sins. When sin completes its work, it brings death.

Wednesday, August 10, 2022

Kristi Burke : From Holy To Heretic | Why she Left Christianity






In the above video, Kristi Burke a HARD LEFT ATHEIST EXTREMIST tells her viewers that the main reason she defected from the Christian faith was due to doctrinal differences involving the DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION among other theological misconceptions which she struggled with. But that was not the entire story with regards to her defecting from the faith. There was something more SINISTER that was going on in her life. And I share that with you below so that you can see the BIG PICTURE with regards to how this young woman took a wrong detour in her life while traveling on the HIGHWAY TO HELL!

BEFORE YOU CONTINUE READING BELOW, BE ADVISED THAT KRISTI BURKE'S BLOG HAS BEEN REMOVED. I BELIEVE THAT IT IS PLAUSIBLE SHE CLOSED HER BLOG ACCOUNT IN ORDER TO PREVENT ME FROM HAVING ACCESS TO OTHER SENSITIVE INFORMATION. SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, I AM GLAD I WAS ABLE TO EXTRACT THIS INFORMATION BEFORE HER BLOG WAS DELETED.

 Kristi Burke's past religious life

Kristi Burke's Religious Trauma eventually led her to become an Atheist. The following is an excerpt from her blog April 26, 2021:

TEN YEARS EARLIER

I was slumped in shock in the living room of my home. Twelve familiar faces were circling around me, intervention style. Their eyes were burning through me—Bibles at their sides, with hands clinging to tissues. I was nineteen at the time, but I was still a child to them. These faces were heavy with disappointment, and they were taking turns letting me know just that.

They were there to bring me back to god. They believed that he had given them the authority to do just that. They felt that because I was partying on the weekends, exploring my sexuality, and questioning my faith, I was being pulled under Satan's evil grip. Each one took a self-righteous moment to let the judgment and shame roll off their tongues, spilling out and spreading around me like toxic sludge.



This was when they revealed that they had been watching my every move for quite some time. They had been illegally tracking my digital activity and communications. They installed a key logger program on my computer and phone that gave them full access to my life, even the most secret and private moments. They printed what they considered to be the worst of it, gripping to a stack in their laps as they shamed me for what was inside them. I had never felt such a deep violation of privacy before that moment. I felt humiliated and small and confused.


As the night progressed and they didn't get the response they hoped for, I was physically detained and prayed over, accused of things I didn't do, held against my will, and even threatened by a grown man with a closed fist. They took my computer and car keys, and an attempt was made to conceal my phone; they didn't want to give me the opportunity to call someone to pick me up. There was a moment that night when I felt so terrified that I fell to the floor and felt that familiar weakening feeling: racing heart, numb face, tight lungs, a panic-induced asthma attack. I was given an inhaler, but not before furious purple faces hurled their rage, accusing me of faking it entirely. Thankfully, within a few hours, I managed to get the hell out.
Continuing with her article Mrs. Burke makes the following recommendations to her viewers( there are several but I just selected this one in order to expose the dark side of her persona):

  1. #5) Find your identity. Discover what makes you happy, especially if the church forbade it. Watch dirty movies, read raunchy books, date around, do shrooms in the forest, rock some heavy cleavage- whatever makes you happy and allows your freak flag to fly high (please do this responsibly. And legally *wink*)

    A side note here: You may be wondering what is a SCHROOM. Answere: from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

  2. A mushroom, especially one taken as a 
  3.  psychedelic drug. 
  4. Dear viewer: This to me speaks volumes about this woman's persona. Just use your own imagination.
Examining further into Ms. Burke's blog I came across this statement from an article which she published on June 21, 2021:
" If you believe the church has victimized you, there are resources to help you sort it out. One of my favorite resources is RecoveringFromReligion.Org,"

Dear Viewer: What Ms. Burke does not tell you in this article is that this counseling center also offers their services not only to Atheist like herself, but to all kinds of RELIGIOUS CULTS. Here is the evidence on this link on the left side menu bar of your screen under belief systems: 

Resources - Recovering from Religion

  1. There is no doubt in my mind that the diatribes and heretical views which she publishes on her videos on Tik Tok against God, the Bible and Christianity in general are being drawn from the above aforementioned website. If you carefully scrutinize the contents of her videos to what this website promotes/endorses, you will be able to connect the dots.
  2.  
  3. Below are two videos as an example
  4.  

  5.  
  6. In the 2 videos below Kristi Burke claims that her moral
  7. values are far more superior as an Atheist than when
  8. she was a Christian. Keep on reading below these 2 videos for the absolute truth.
  9.  
  10.  

  11.  
On March 29th, 2021 Kristi Burke wrote on her blog an article sharing her perspective of Satan and I quote:

"Committing sacrilege in speech, art, or any other outlet, is a way of empowering ourselves and showing our abuser, the church, that we are no longer afraid. We've let go of the shame and the guilt we never deserved to have in the first place. We let go of the need to be accepted by a community of people that require subservience over genuineness. We live with the scars and the trauma but still we overcome. We fight for our existence, our truth and our power. We create art which destroys the fears that once kept us bound. We express ourselves in ways that help us process and heal from our trauma, but also inadvertently offends those who've yet to break their own chains- because fear still clouds their eyes. We show them what it looks like to live fearlessly and proud, and hope that it might one day inspire them to break away and do the same. We just want to heal and live our truth the best way we know how. We can play with our fears because they no longer rule us. We can give lap dances to Satan and sell sneakers with pentagrams and create a mockery of everything that wanted to suppress us because that is the ultimate way to gain back what they stole and reclaim our lives. To show them that they no longer rule us."


In her own words she unwittingly admits that she doesn't have any scruples when it comes to encouraging her readers to indulge in shameful sinful acts i.e. like doing lap dances to Satan and smoking magic mushrooms in the woods when no one is around, watching pornographic movies, read pornographic books; and among other things she mentions in the two previous paragraphs above. The only people you find doing lap dances are the LYING SLUTS you find in WHORE HOUSES BECAUSE THAT'S HOW THEY MAKE A LIVING OUT OF IT! Anyone who encourages their readers to indulge in these abominations definitely does not have any decent moral values. ON THE CONTRARY THEY ARE MORALLY BANKRUPT. 

AS ONE OF THEIR ATHEIST PHILOSOPHER PUT IT:

“For myself, as, no doubt, for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaningless was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom.” Aldous Huxley, atheist, writer, novelist, philosopher".

 Christianophobia is on the rise like never before especially in platforms like social media. Christianophobia refers to the state of being hateful or spiteful against Christians, Christianity, and God. A Christianophobe hates or despises Christians and/or what they stand for. Many Christians on Tik Tok have filed multiple complaints against Ms. Burke for Hate Speech/Christianophobia. According to a recent video she posted on Tik Tok, her account is being reviewed for possible termination. If so she has stated she plans to come to You Tube in order to continue her Anti-Christian diatribe. She professes to be an Atheist. The statements on her video above is a gross contradiction. Because Atheist DO NOT BELIEVE THERE IS A GOD. Yet she unwittingly acknowledges God's very existence by using him as a scapegoat. Closely linked to the disillusioned are those who call themselves “atheists” when, in fact, they are anti-God. Atheist is a label some hide behind to mask a deep hatred toward God. Often due to childhood trauma or abuse in the name of religion/ Church, these people are consumed by an antipathy toward all things religious. The only way they can retaliate against a God they consider cruel is to deny Him vehemently. Events of the past have left wounds so deep that it is easier to deny the reality of God than admit that they hate Him. True atheists would not include this group in their numbers, as they recognize that to be angry with God is to acknowledge His existence. But many people do, in fact, call themselves atheists while simultaneously expressing outrage toward a God whose existence they deny.   


Dear reader: Kristi Burke to the best of my knowledge has no professional degrees or formal training from a theological seminary. She is simply an ARTIST who likes to draw pictures. She defected from Christianity because she was caught living habitually in sin by church officials who were keeping track of her sinful life style as a teenager. Instead of repenting and asking God for forgiveness, she turned against God and became an ATHEIST WHILE TAKING THE HIGHWAY TO HELL. SHE MADE THAT DECISION WITH HER OWN FREE WILL! GOD NEVER FORCED HER TO MAKE THAT CHOICE. Many of the videos and comments which she makes like the one above, takes scripture out of context. This is known as EISEGESIS and by employing this method of interpreting scripture, you can make it mean whatever you want it to mean by injecting your own personal BIASES. ALWAYS REMEMBER: SCRIPTURE ALWAYS INTERPRETS SCRIPTURE WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SACRED TEXT!

Some final thoughts:

 Young Lady it's unfortunate you took a wrong detour in your life. I too am a victim of religious abuse. But I chose instead to remain faithful to my Redeemer regardless of what hardships I had to endure. Because in the end God makes all things work together for our good; for those who truly love him Romans 8:28. Take it for what it's worth or you can discard what I said. The choice is yours. But I will follow the Biblical mandate to contend for the faith Jude 1:3. You still have time. But God will not wait forever for you to make up your mind. We all have an EXPIRATION DATE STAMPED WITHIN OUR BODIES. Then judgement day will inevitably come for all of us. Then he will demand for us to account for our lives. At which point each person will receive from God eternal rewards or eternal consequences for their transgressions for abusing God's eternal love and mercy. Is that what you want Kristi?. "And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment" Hebrews 9:27.

  WHATEVER A PERSON, WHETHER A SATANIST, AGNOSTIC OR ATHEIST DECIDES TO BELIEVE  IS STRICTLY THEIR OWN PROBLEM.  IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING TO WHAT TRUE BELIEVERS IN GOD STAND FOR.  ULTIMATELY THESE INDIVIDUALS WILL ONE DAY STAND BEFORE THE GREAT WHITE THRONE JUDGEMENT OF GOD TO ACCOUNT FOR THEIR LIVES.

AT WHICH POINT GOD WILL EXTRACT PAYMENT FROM THEM FOR THEIR WICKEDNESS AND BE CONSIGNED TO THE LAKE OF FIRE WHICH IS THE SECOND DEATH!
REVELATION 21:8
 
FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING
KRISTI BURKE SIMPLY CLICK ON THE
LABEL NAMED AFTER HER AT THE TOP
AND BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.