60 YEARS LATER EX-CIA AGENT REVEALS CIA'S INVOLVEMENT IN JFK'S ASSASINATION
JFK'S ASSASINATION SCENE
JFK'S BODY IN MORGUE
PREFACE
The continued concealment of the
JFK documents is drawing criticism from the right wing media too. Here’s Tucker
Carlson this week, who said that he had spoken to a confidential source
with direct access to the undisclosed documents — and that those
documents include a bombshell:
Tucker Carlson: We spoke to
someone who had access to the still-hidden CIA documents, a person who
was deeply familiar with what they contain. We asked this person
directly: Did the CIA have a hand in the murder of John F. Kennedy, an
American president?
And here’s the reply we received,
verbatim: “The answer is yes. I believe they were involved. It’s a whole
different country from what we thought it was. It’s all fake.”
It’s hard to imagine a more jarring
response than that. Again, this is not a “conspiracy theorist” that we
spoke to. Not even close. This is someone with direct knowledge of the
information that once again is being withheld from the American public.
And the answer that we received was unequivocal: "Yes, the CIA was
involved in the assassination of the president".
Tucker even threw some shade at his friend Mike Pompeo:
TC: And people have known this
for a long time. The people who knew would include every director of the
CIA since November of 1963. And that list would include Obama’s CIA
Director John Brennan, one of the most sinister and dishonest figures in
American life.
That list would also include — we are
sad to say — our friend Mike Pompeo, who ran the CIA in the last
administration. Mike Pompeo knew this. We asked Pompeo to join us
tonight, and though he rarely turns down a televised interview, he
refused to come.
Nov 22nd, 2023JFK and the UNSPEAKABLE
PART I
Why He Died and Why It Matters
Jim Douglass spoke at St. Bonaventure University in Olean NY in 2010.
The murder of Kennedy -- 53 years ago -- should enable us to understand the deep state opposition to President Donald Trump. Both sought peace with Russia. Rather than assassinate Trump, they thought they had the power to rid themselves of him by impeaching him (twice!) and defrauding him of re-election; the press is even more under their control than it was a half-century ago.
A brief note on why we’ve posted this video 12 years after we filmed it:
Jim Douglass’ book was published in 2008. In 2010 we were invited to interview the author by Prof. Barry Gan at St. Bonaventure University in Olean NY. At that time we were still preoccupied with documenting the false flag 9/11 inside job (see snowshoefilms.com and yoryevrah - on Youtube) for most of our early video).
We were also working with James Fetzer documenting the assassination (and cover-up) of Sen/ Paul Wellstone (D-Minnesota), producing the documentary series, WELLSTONE, THEY KILLED HIM. We were also doing extended interviews with E. Michael Jones (the basis of our documentary series, GOY GUIDE TO WORLD HISTORY (mostly now scrubbed from Youtube). By 2010 we’d already done several interviews on JFK, including with Jim Marrs; Prof. Donald Gibson and his two books on JFK; Fetzer’s book MURDER IN DEALEY PLAZA — as well as MARY'S MOSAIC and DR. MARY'S MONKEY, and others.
Though we’d read Douglass’ book when it was published, JFK’s assassination wasn’t high on our list of priorities. We were documenting the use of depleted uranium in Iraq (especially with Sister Rosalie Bertell), as well as the neo-con Netanyahu-orchestrated plan to create ‘Greater Eretz’ by obliterating 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Libya and Iran. So many crimes were on-going that we couldn't take the time to sort through the 20 hours of film on Douglass’ taken on the 1963 assassination; the crimes continue.
But recently we re-read Douglass’ excellent book which documents the deep state and JFK’s effort to combat it.
The murder of JFK was truly a coup d’état; it kept the cold war going; LBJ reversed Kennedy's attempt to stop it. The assassination was meant to be a false flag, blaming it on the Cubans and the Soviets, using Oswald as the patsy reflecting Castro et al. LBJ with others backed off quickly from that, going for the lone nut theory, making Oswald solely responsible. Though it was a successful assassination, it was a real botched job; too many people knew; too many people had evidence, and too many agencies were in on it; so the cover-up required a huge amount of killing; Douglass documents those multiple murders. The video offered here is only one part of three separate venues we filmed that day. We've not presented our interview with Douglass, in large part because we harangued him more that simply focused on the extraordinary book he presented; we wanted him to acknowledge the fact that as a new president, following Bush's eight years, Obama had to go along with the 9/11 narrative that Muslims did it, providing the rationale to continue the neo-con's program to create Greater Eretz.
The acclaimed book Oliver Stone called “the best account I have read of this tragedy and its significance,” JFK and the Unspeakable details not just how the conspiracy to assassinate President John F. Kennedy was carried out, but WHY it was done…and why it still matters today.
At the height of the Cold War, JFK risked committing the greatest crime in human history: starting a nuclear war. Horrified by the specter of nuclear annihilation, Kennedy gradually turned away from his long-held Cold Warrior beliefs and toward a policy of lasting peace. But to the military and intelligence agencies in the United States, who were committed to winning the Cold War at any cost, Kennedy’s change of heart was a direct threat to their power and influence. Once these dark “Unspeakable” forces recognized that Kennedy’s interests were in direct opposition to their own, they tagged him as a dangerous traitor, plotted his assassination, and orchestrated the subsequent cover-up.
Douglass takes readers into the Oval Office during the tense days of the Cuban Missile Crisis, along on the strange journey of Lee Harvey Oswald and his shadowy handlers, and to the winding road in Dallas where an ambush awaited the President’s motorcade. As Douglass convincingly documents, at every step along the way these forces of the Unspeakable were present, moving people like pawns on a chessboard to promote a dangerous and deadly agenda.
JFK and the Unspeakable shot up to the top of the bestseller charts when Oliver Stone first brought it to the world’s attention on Bill Maher’s show. Since then, it has been lauded by Mark Lane (author of Rush to Judgment, who calls it “an exciting work with the drama of a first-rate thriller”), John Perkins (author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, who proclaims it is “arguably the most important book yet written about an American president), and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who calls it “a very well-documented and convincing portrait…I urge all Americans to read this book and come to their own conclusions.”
By now there's not nearly as much disagreement regarding what
happened to John and Robert Kennedy as major communications corporations
would have you believe. While every researcher and author highlights
different details, there isn't any serious disagreement among, say, Jim
Douglass' JFK and the Unspeakable, Howard Hunt's deathbed confession,
and David Talbot's new The Devil's Chessboard.
Jon Schwarz says
The Devil's Chessboard confirms that "your darkest suspicions about how
the world operates are likely an underestimate. Yes, there is an
amorphous group of unelected corporate lawyers, bankers, and
intelligence and military officials who form an American 'deep state,'
setting real limits on the rare politicians who ever try to get out of
line."
For those of us who were already convinced of that up to
our eyeballs, Talbot's book is still one of the best I've seen on the
Dulles brothers and one of the best I've seen on the assassination of
John F. Kennedy. Where it differs from Douglass' book, I think, is not
so much in the evidence it relates or the conclusions it draws, but in
providing an additional motivation for the crime.
JFK and the
Unspeakable depicts Kennedy as getting in the way of the violence that
Allen Dulles and gang wished to engage in abroad. He wouldn't fight Cuba
or the Soviet Union or Vietnam or East Germany or independence
movements in Africa. He wanted disarmament and peace. He was talking
cooperatively with Khrushchev, as Eisenhower had tried prior to the
U2-shootdown sabotage. The CIA was overthrowing governments in Iran,
Guatemala, the Congo, Vietnam, and around the world. Kennedy was getting
in the way.
The Devil's Chessboard depicts Kennedy, in addition,
as himself being the sort of leader the CIA was in the habit of
overthrowing in those foreign capitals. Kennedy had made enemies of
bankers and industrialists. He was working to shrink oil profits by
closing tax loopholes, including the "oil depletion allowance." He was
permitting the political left in Italy to participate in power,
outraging the extreme right in Italy, the U.S., and the CIA. He
aggressively went after steel corporations and prevented their price
hikes. This was the sort of behavior that could get you overthrown if
you lived in one of those countries with a U.S. embassy in it.
Yes,
Kennedy wanted to eliminate or drastically weaken and rename the CIA.
Yes he threw Dulles and some of his gang out the door. Yes he refused to
launch World War III over Cuba or Berlin or anything else. Yes he had
the generals and warmongers against him, but he also had Wall Street
against him.
Of course "politicians who ever try to get out of
line" are now, as then, but more effectively now, handled first by the
media. If the media can stop them or some other maneuver can stop them
(character assassination, blackmail, distraction, removal from power)
then violence isn't required.
The fact that Kennedy resembled a
coup target, not just a protector of other targets, would be bad news
for someone like Senator Bernie Sanders if he ever got past the media,
the "super delegates," and the sell-out organizations to seriously
threaten to take the White House. A candidate who accepts the war
machine to a great extent and resembles Kennedy not at all on questions
of peace, but who takes on Wall Street with the passion it deserves,
could place himself as much in the cross-hairs of the deep state as a
Jeremy Corbyn who takes on both capital and killing.
Accounts of
the escapades of Allen Dulles, and the dozen or more partners in crime
whose names crop up beside his decade after decade, illustrate the power
of a permanent plutocracy, but also the power of particular individuals
to shape it. What if Allen Dulles and Winston Churchill and others like
them hadn't worked to start the Cold War even before World War II was
over? What if Dulles hadn't collaborated with Nazis and the U.S.
military hadn't recruited and imported so many of them into its ranks?
What if Dulles hadn't worked to hide information about the holocaust
while it was underway? What if Dulles hadn't betrayed Roosevelt and
Russia to make a separate U.S. peace with Germany in Italy? What if
Dulles hadn't begun sabotaging democracy in Europe immediately and
empowering former Nazis in Germany? What if Dulles hadn't turned the CIA
into a secret lawless army and death squad? What if Dulles hadn't
worked to end Iran's democracy, or Guatemala's? What if Dulles' CIA
hadn't developed torture, rendition, human experimentation, and murder
as routine policies? What if Eisenhower had been permitted to talk with
Khrushchev? What if Dulles hadn't tried to overthrow the President of
France? What if Dulles had been "checked" or "balanced" ever so slightly
by the media or Congress or the courts along the way?
These are
tougher questions than "What if there had been no Lee Harvey Oswald?"
The answer to that is, "There would have been another guy very similar
to serve the same purpose, just as there had been in the earlier attempt
on JFK in Chicago. But "What if there had been no Allen Dulles?" looms
large enough to suggest the possible answer that we would all be better
off, less militarized, less secretive, less xenophobic. And that
suggests that the deep state is not uniform and not unstoppable.
Talbot's powerful history is a contribution to the effort to stop it.
No comments:
Post a Comment