Labels

Monday, September 12, 2016

ANOTHER BOOK ABOUT ESOTERIC MYSTERIES BY JONATHAN CAHN





DR. MICHAEL BROWN A CLOSE ASSOCIATE
OF JONATHAN CAHN EVEN EXPOSES THE
DANGERS BEHIND THESE JEWISH MYSTICAL
WRITNGS KNOWN AS THE ZOHAR/KABBALAH
IN THIS VIDEO BELOW. I SUGGETS YOU QUE
THE VIDEO TO TIME FRAME 35 MINUTES



jonathan-cahn-false-teacher

JONATHAN CAHN-  Jewish Mysticism / Extra-Biblical Sources/ Prophetic Fraud/ And Revealer of Bogus Mysteries

VIDEO #1 trailer



Jonathan Cahn: What is the Book of Mysteries?

VIDEO #2 trailer



IMPORTANT UPDATE:

THE VIDEO BELOW WAS RELEASED BY JONATHAN CAHN ON APRIL 17th 2017. AFTER YOU'RE DONE WATCHING THIS VIDEO,  I  PRESENT INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE REFUTING HIS CLAIMS ABOUT HIS BOOK "THE BOOK OF MYSTERIES".
ALSO IN THIS VIDEO,   JONATHAN CAHN ATTEMPS  TO JUSTIFY HIS USE OF OCCULTIC RABBINICAL WRITINGS  BY CLAIMING THAT HE WAS FOLLOWING IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF ONE OF THE APOSTLES(PAUL) WHEN HE(CAHN) USED OCCULTIC WRITINGS (i.e.THE ZOHAR & BABYLONIAN TALMUD) AS A BRIDGE BUILDER TO SHARE THE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST. NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH, AND IT SHOULD BE DULY NOTED BY ALL CHRISTIANS ESPECIALLY MINISTERS OF THE GOSPEL THAT THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO SCRIPTURAL BASIS TO SUPPORT MR. CAHN'S CLAIMS; THAT THE APOSTLE PAUL RESORTED TO OCCULTIC PAGAN WRITINGS AS A BRIDGE BUILDER FOR APOLOGETICS PURPOSES IN ORDER TO SHARE THE GOOD NEWS OF THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN AT ATHENS GREECE. GO TO THE FOLLOWING LINK BELOW FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION REFUTING MR. CAHN'S ERRONEOUS THEOLOGICAL VIEWS:

Paul’s Purpose at Athens and the Problem of "Common Ground …



Jonathan Cahn Addresses 'Book of Mysteries', Kabbalah & Issues





Kabbalah Secrets Christians Need to Know: 

An In Depth Study of the Kosher Pig 

and the Gods of Jewish Mysticism 

A top selling book in Christianity and Ministry on Amazon!   

by Deanne Loper



We live in a time when false teachings are infiltrating Christian Theology at a rapid rate. This important book exposes one of the greatest threats to pure Biblical Christianity. Deanne Loper uncovers the deception by giving a detailed description of what Kabbalah is and equips believers to recognize it in its morphed form of Christianity. The evidence shows that the god of today’s Babylonian and kabbalistic Judaism is NOT the God of the Bible and that the current convergence of Christians coming under rabbinic authority will bring them, not to the one true God of the Bible, but to the subservience of the god of Kabbalah – Ein Sof – and to its hierarchy of gods.


THE FOLLOWING EXCERPT WAS TAKEN FROM CHARISMA MAGAZINE
AUGUST 2015 ON AN ARTICLE THAT WAS WRITTEN ABOUT JONATHAN CAHN:

"After a search that took him(Jonathan Cahn) through the OCCULT, UFOs and NOSTRADAMUS".....
                                                                             TROY ANDERSON page 58                      

Apparently, the time has come for the false Jewish prophets of Mystery Schools that are prevalent in some Messianic Jewish circles to come out of the closet and take a bow. Now that Christians have been trained to search for hidden messages in their Bibles, Jonathan Cahn has come out with his third book; "The Book of Mysteries." Does the Bible contain "mysteries," hidden codes and dates for Christians to distract themselves searching out? Absolutely not! God never intended for His word to be a book of mysteries to be unlocked. That is  thoroughly  based on Gnostic teaching.

First we were presented with The Harbinger. Then the Mystery of the Shemitah. Both were proven to be bogus mysteries by Bible Scholars from around the country. And now once again we are presented with  Jonathan Cahn's latest gimmick " THE BOOK OF MYSTERIES". Jonathan Cahn has portrayed himself to the world as a modern day Old Testament Prophet who supposedly receives revelations from God, and has the ability to UNLOCK MYSTERIES FROM THE BIBLE LIKE NO OTHER HUMAN BEING HAS DONE SINCE THE DAWN OF MANKIND, THROUGH DREAMS AND VISIONS AND OTHER WORLDLY ORACLES. MAN GIVE ME A BREAK! NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH. THAT MEANS THAT KING SOLOMON, THE PROPHET DANIEL, THE APOSTLE PAUL AND EVEN THE LORD JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF COULD NOT MATCH UP TO JONATHAN CAHN BECAUSE THEY JUST DIDN'T MAKE THE CUT. BY BIBLICAL DEFINITION, THIS GUY JUST FITS THE BILL OF A FALSE PROPHET, WHO HAS DUPED MILLIONS OF CHRISTIANS AROUND THE WORLD WHILE CASHING IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM PROFIT SALES. AND HIS LATEST BOOK  IS JUST ANOTHER PLOY TO COVER UP THAT FACT.  It is my personal belief that Jonathan Cahn is suffering from delusions of grandeur and that usually is a sign that this person may be an egomaniac and not even realize it.

"The book begins by taking Jonathan Cahn and his initiates to a desert place where students live as the people of old did, in caves or small dwellings with no modern conveniences such as electricity or the Internet, this is obviously the caves of the Qumran where a Jewish sect known as the Essenes lived and eventually the Dead Sea Scrolls were later discovered. The Qumran Caves were not entirely barren. There were carefully maintained gardens of trees, plants, vines, and flowers. The Essenes lived on the shores of lakes and rivers, away from cities and towns, and practiced a communal way of life, sharing equally in everything. They were mainly agriculturists and arboriculturists, having a vast knowledge of crops, soil and climatic conditions which enabled them to grow a great variety of fruits and vegetables in comparatively desert areas and with a minimum of labor."
The teacher taught concepts to his students one at a time, during any time of day, while the student was working or resting, and sometimes it was in response to a question the student asked" .

(NOTE: THE INTERNAL EVIDENCE PROVIDED IN THE ABOVE PARAGRAPH CAN BE FOUND IN THE CHAPTER TITLED" IN THE BEGINNING".  It clearly shows how Jonathan Cahn very subtly used the Essenes  cult as a template in order to introduce his readers to this odyssey).

Another interesting observation I made is the official trailer video above in video #1. You can very easily see in fragment forms of what appears to be  the ESSENE'S  BOOK OF MYSTERIES FOUND AMONG THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS, AN ELDERLY MAN  IN A CAVE PLAYING THE ROLE  OF TEACHER OF RIGHTEOUSNESS,  QUMRAN CAVES IN THE DESERT,  OTHER ANCIENT BOOKS FOUND IN THE  QUMRAN CAVES etc, etc.  KNOWING JONATHAN CAHN'S  APOLOGETICS APPROACH, THE OTHER ANCIENT BOOKS BEING ALLUDED TO IN THIS VIDEO #1 TRAILER ARE  EXTRA BIBLICAL SOURCES, THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD WRITTEN BY NEW AGE RABBINICAL SAGES.  Also in video #2 at approximately time frame 25 seconds, Jonathan Cahn clearly makes reference to the MYSTERIES OF THE RABBIS AND THEIR WRITINGS  REFERRING TO NEW AGE RABBINICAL SAGES. GO TO THE LINK BELOW FOR MORE DETAILS:
http://seraphimre.blogspot.com/2015/02/jonathan-cahn-teaching-from-babylonian.html

The Book of Mysteries and the way it is constructed closely resembles another unnamed wisdom book found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, variously called The Secret of the Way Things Are or the Sapiential Work. In both texts, the term raz occurs frequently. Raz means "mystery" or "secret", and is defined as a type of wisdom or knowledge that is known by God and can only be known by humans by divine revelation. This word often occurs in the phrase raz nihyeh, which can be translated as "the secret of the way things are". The assumption behind The Book of Mysteries is that revelation, not reason, is the key to wisdom. According to a Jewish legend, one of the Essenes, named Menachem, had passed at least some of his mystical knowledge to the Talmudic mystic Nehunya ben HaKanah, to whom the Kabbalistic tradition attributes Sefer HaBahir and, by some opinions, Sefer HaKanah, Sefer HaPeliah, and Sefer HaTemunah. Some Essene rituals, such as daily immersion in the mikveh, coincide with contemporary Hasidic practices; some historians have also suggested that the name "Essene" is a Hellenized form of the word "Hasidim" or "Hasid".


It is interesting to note that the Essenes were also the authors of SEVERAL HOROSCOPES, 4Q186,4Q534, & 4Q561. HOROSCOPES FALL UNDER THE KNOWLEDGE BRANCH OF THE OCCULT. This is equivalent to DIVINATION which is unlocking secret knowledge/MYSTERIES. The Essenes also utilized a system of GEMATRIA/NUMEROLOGY. By applying the various forms of Kabbalistic gematria and numerology to the Bible, entirely heretical meanings can be promoted as also is demonstrated with the process of Temura or permutation of the Scriptures. The Essenes also believed in REINCARNATION. The Essenes were a monastic order of Jews in New Testament times whose doctrines was an EXTREME FORM OF PHARISAISM.  This Jewish monastic order, as their records now disclose, recognized as their head a "TEACHER OF RIGHTEOUSNESS" who had revealed to them secret mysteries of rules for life.


The Pharisees are the ancestors of modern day ORTHODOX JUDAISM WITH THEIR OCCULTIC WRITINGS i.e. THE ZOHAR, THE BABYLONIAN AND PALESTINIAN TALMUD. Rabbinic/Orthodox Judaism is an anti-biblical religion of racism, self worship,superstition, and deceit.

JONATHAN CAHN'S book makes reference to an unnamed ESSENE TEACHER(perhaps alluding to himself as the main character) who claims to be the recipient of such a revelation and is passing it along to his initiates. It is under this  setting or paradigm that Jonathan Cahn takes his readers on a mystical journey.

Why end times FANTASY WRITER JONATHAN CAHN'S book failed the acid test:

I make the following quotation from the book "CORRECTING THE CULTS"
from pages 108-109(authors Norman L. Geisler & Ron Rhodes apologist).

"Mathew 13:10-11: DID JESUS TEACH THAT WE NEED TO SEEK A HIDDEN, SECONDARY(esoteric) MEANING IN SCRIPTURE, AS NEW AGERS SAY?
Misinterpretation: Some New Agers appeal to Mathew 13:10-11 in an attempt to show that we should seek secret and hidden(esoteric) meaning in scripture. Jesus is portrayed being in front of a multitude composed of both believers and unbelievers. He did not attempt to separate the believers from the unbelievers and then instruct only the believers. Rather, he constructed his teaching in such a way that believers would understand what he said but unbelievers would not-by using parables. Then, after teaching one such parable, a disciple asked Jesus: "Why do you speak to the people in parables"? (see Mathew 13:10). Jesus answered: "THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE SECRETS(OR MYSTERIES) OF THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN HAS BEEN GIVEN TO YOU BUT NOT TO THEM cf Mathew 13:11. Clearly then Mathew 13 does not support but rather argues against esotericism".

Jesus held to a literal not a esoteric method of interpreting scripture and is clear in that he literally interpreted the creation account of Adam and Eve cf Mathew 13:35,25:34,Mark 10:6, the account of Noah's Ark and the Flood cf Mathew 24:38-39,Luke 17:26-27, the account of Jonah and the Whale
cf Mathew 12:39-41, the account of Sodom and Gomorrah cf Mathew 10:15, and the account of Lot and his Wife cf Luke 17: 28-29.

In her commentary on The Harbinger, Christine Pack wrote:

"(The apostle) Paul does talk about the mystery of Gentiles and Jews being united together in a common church and common faith (something that could have scarcely been imagined in Old Testament times). There is also the mystery of Jesus Christ, who was dimly glimpsed through types and shadows in the Old Testament, but Who was gloriously revealed in his fullness as our Savior in the New Testament. But these are mysteries which are laid open for all to see and know and understand and respond to, and not clues on a Mysterious Journey to Somewhere (which is really the more western understanding of the word "mystery")."
  • Secrets and Mysteries
Many false prophets claim to have received messages and / or visions from God that are to be kept secret from other people, sometimes until a specified time.

Beware of this as it actually elevates the false prophet since it makes him / her special, with privy to “secret” information. This is not the way of God.

I can think of only one place in the Bible where something like this occurred. In Revelation 10:1-4 John is told by an angel to not reveal that which the seven peals of thunder had spoken. It is obvious from the scriptures that this was done not to elevate John, but for purposes that only God knows. In addition, this account occurs in the Bible, which we know to be the inspired Word of God.

In addition to secrets, there are those who include mysteries in their prophecies. These take the form of mysterious words, phrases, connotations, numerical puzzles, and riddles that leave the reader either mystified or confused.

Again, this brings elevation to the false prophet since he supposedly received these things and it implies that he is the one to whom God has chosen to know the mystery. The words “mystery” and “mysteries” appear 26 times in the New Testament (New American Standard Version). In all cases the mystery is revealed to the believers. Only the unbelievers are left mystified, and it is no wonder, since they are unable to see the truth that is in Christ. Satan is the author of mysteries that are given to men for elevation.

On Gnosticism:

"Gnosticism is a very old heresy that teaches that the truth has to be decoded, uncovered, unlocked, unveiled, discovered".

Secret Knowledge = Gnosticism

Gnosticism is a heresy because, according to God, we are given all that we need for life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3) in God's word. We don't need to decode secret mysteries, unravel sealed up messages, decipher clues, or pull back the veil on hidden things. All that we need, all that God wants us to know, is contained in the Bible.

Going back for a minute to Cahn's original work "The Harbinger," let's look at the title. The word,"Harbinger" is kind of an old fashioned word referring to someone or something that foreshadows an upcoming event. But it's use tells us something about the beliefs of the writer Mr. Cahn, just as the use of certain terminology by John Nelson Darby makes his association with Theosophy clear. Interestingly, Helena Blavatsky frequently used the term "Harbinger," in relation to Lucifer. (Thanks go out to DeAnne for bringing this to my attention):

"It is but natural - even from the dead letter standpoint - to view Satan, the Serpent of Genesis, as the real creator and benefactor, the Father of Spiritual mankind. For it is he who was the "Harbinger of Light," bright radiant Lucifer, who opened the eyes of the automaton created by Jehovah, as alleged; and he who was the first to whisper: "in the day ye eat thereof ye shall be as Elohim, knowing good and evil" - can only be regarded in the light of a Saviour." - Wandering Jew (Vol. 2, p. 243).

Helena Petrovna Blavatsky was a Russian occultist, spirit medium, and author who co-founded the Theosophical Society in 1875. The Theosophical Society is a LUCIFER IAN OCCULT RELIGION.


It is evident that mysticism abounds in the books and teachings of Jonathan Cahn.  In an interview with Jonathan Bernis, Jonathan Cahn referred to The Oracle as "the mystery of the ages" and "the blueprint of end-time prophecy." 34  A cursory examination of the mystery schools will reveal the coded language of adepts in books like Manly P. Hall's The Secret Teachings of all Ages, in which he dedicates four lengthy chapters to The Secret Doctrine of Israel and refers to "Kabbalism as a key to Masonic esotericism."

THE SECRET TEACHINGS OF ALL AGES [ANNOTATED AND ILLUSTRATED]: AN ... 

The Book of Mysteries by Jonathan Cahn is written in a narrative resembling that of the Zohar.  Presented as a daily devotional, The Book of Mysteries follows the one-year journey of a traveler's odyssey through deserts and secret chambers to discover "Hidden Keys" to the "Secrets of the Ages" revealed by a man known only as "the teacher."  The Zohar tells a similar story of "a group of 'wandering mystics' headed by their grand master, Rabbi Shimon bar Yohai" as they travel through the deserts of the Holy Land to uncover "the deepest mysteries of Torah." 37  In the tradition of the Zohar's orally transmitted secrets, the teacher in The Book of Mysteries tells his apprentice, "And so the mysteries have been passed down from teacher to disciple, from age to age."

Within the umbrella of kabbalistic texts can be found the Sefer HaRazim or The Book of Mysteries.  This original version of the Book of Mysteries is a collection of magical incantations said to be revealed to Noah by the angel Raziel.  It is divided into seven sections, each section describing one of the seven heavens.  Included is a list of the hierarchy of accompanying angels whose secret names may be invoked to assist the spirit traveler in his ascent to the throne.  The legend - or fable - surrounding the Sefer HaRazim Book of Mysteries is that it was passed down through the ages to Solomon and was the source of his "wisdom and purported magical powers." 



QUE THE VIDEO BELOW TO TIME
FRAME 7:45 FOR A DISCUSSION ON 
THE SEFER HA RAZIM OR THE BOOK
OF MYSTERIES FOR MORE DETAILS




Contributing source: Kabbalah Secrets Christians need to know by Author DeAnne Loper.


THE FOLLOWING IS AN EXCERPT FROM THE BACK COVER OF THE HARBINGER:

"Before its end as a nation, there appeared in ancient Israel nine specific warnings and OMENS of national destruction – These same nine HARBINGERS are now manifesting in America with profound ramifications for America's future and end-time prophecy".
Anyone who believes that the Harbinger is based solely on the inerrant word of God will be subjected to a great delusion. Mr. Cahn introduces the concept of JEWISH MYSTICAL THOUGHT WITHIN THE HARBINGER to his readers vaguely under the following pages: 11, 40,97,240,& 242. THIS CONCEPT HAS A DIRECT BEARING ON MR. CAHN'S EXTRA-BIBLICAL THEOLOGY.  THE WORD HARBINGER ALSO MEANS OMEN.  IT IS FORBIDDEN IN GOD'S WORD TO INTERPRET OMENS. ANYONE WHO DOES SO IS DABBLING WITH THE OCCULT AND SHAKING HANDS WITH THE DEVIL.  IT IS AN ILLEGITIMATE MEANS OF TRYING TO DETERMINE THE WILL OF GOD!  SEE PASSAGE BELOW:   

“When you enter the land which the Lord your God gives you, you shall not learn to IMITATE the detestable things of those nations.  There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, one who uses divination, one who practices witchcraft, or ONE WHO INTERPRETS OMENS, or a sorcerer, or one who casts a spell, or a medium or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead" (Deuteronomy 18:9-11).

Omens are closely tied with fortune-telling and divination, as the omen must be “read” or “divined” by someone who knows how. Throughout the ancient world, omens (also referred to as signs and portents) were believed, divined, and obeyed. For example, in ancient Assyria if the king received an evil omen, he would go into hiding and the Assyrians would place a decoy king on the throne in anticipation that the evil event would befall the false king instead of the true one. 

However, the Bible expressly forbids divination of any kind: “Let no one be found among you who . . . interprets omens. . . . Anyone who does these things is detestable to the Lord” (Deuteronomy 18:10–12). We do not live by superstition, and we should not be searching for good or evil omens. Our understanding of the spiritual world does not come through the occult. God has given us the ultimate sign of His goodness, love, and grace in Jesus Christ (1 John 4:9). The Bible is our source for spiritual insight (2 Peter 1:19–21).  

 Jonathan Cahn in his book The Harbinger claims that his teachings and sermons are known for their prophetic significance and their revealing of deep mysteries of God’s Word. 


THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH: Jonathan Cahn’s nine harbingers  were after-the-fact analysis or opinions of his own personal doing. They are not really prophecies. It was all an elaborate fabrication which duped millions of Christians around the world.  It is a literary work based on EISEGESIS.  What do I mean by that? Eisegesis involves 1) imagination: what ideas do I want to present? 2) exploration: what Scripture passage seems to fit with my ideas? and 3) application: what does my idea mean? In eisegesis there is  no cross-referencing with related passages of scripture, and no real desire to understand the actual meaning of the sacred text in it's entire context as the biblical author originally intended for his readers. Scripture serves only as a prop to the interpreter’s idea. I know these things because I read the book myself. Also I was present at his Church Beth Israel as a former member and witnessed first hand the evolution of the Harbinger as a continuing series of sermons before it was finally put into print. For more information click on the link below :

THE HARBINGER: A Book based on Prophetic Speculation - blogspot.com

seraphimre.blogspot.com/.../a-book-based-on-prophetic-speculation.html

There is so much to connect Mr. Cahn to New Age Rabbinical  Sages and their MAN MADE DOCTRINAL SYSTEM,  first and most obviously; THE ZOHAR the premier text of occultic knowledge, The Babylonian Talmud,  all having a direct correlation to Babylonian Paganism, Freemasonry, Kabbalah, Theosophy and Gnosticism.  Mr. Cahn before coming to Messiah was once involved with the occult  at some point during his late teen years in search of spiritual  truth. Unfortunately this has continued to influence his critical thinking which is reflective in his apologetics and theology.  A number of years ago, Mr. Cahn produced an 8 volume teaching series "A GUIDE TO THE JEWISH WORLD". In this teaching series Mr. Cahn quotes several times from the Zohar and Babylonian Talmud to supplement his teaching. I (Kris Kringle) personally was at one time exposed to his mystical teachings, since I was once a member of his church Beth Israel. 
    Mr. Cahn over a period of many years has been tapping into these extra-biblical sources mentioned above, written by NEW AGE RABBINICAL SAGES in order to concoct many of his bogus mysteries which obviously has now been put into  book format. CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW AND WATCH THIS VIDEO VERIFYING MY STATEMENT:  In this video he mentions to his host, Pat Robertson, that some of his sources came from ANCIENT JEWISH WRITINGS.  Knowing Mr. Cahn's Apologetic Methods, be assured that the Jewish Writings alluded to here are none other than EXTRA-BIBLICAL SOURCES within the HEBREW STRANDS OF JEWISH TRADITION AND HAVE A DIRECT CORRELATION TO OCCULT JUDAISM.
REMEMBER THE MYSTERY OF THE SHEMITAH WHICH SUPPOSEDLY WAS TO TAKE EFFECT ELUL 29, 2015/ SEPT 13TH, 2015? DID THE U.S.A. AND GLOBAL ECONOMY COLLAPSE LIKE MR. CAHN PREDICTED? THE ANSWER IS A BIG NO! It was an elaborate HOAX. And it eventually fizzled out like the Y2K hoax. The only people who benefited the most from this BIG MULTI MILLION $ HOAX WAS MR. CAHN AND HIS NETWORK OF RELIGIOUS JOKERS. And let's not forget his publisher.

WHILE THIS CONVERGENCE WAS TAKING PLACE AMONG THEM 3 THINGS WERE UNFOLDING SIMULTANEOUSLY: 1)THE TALK SHOW HOSTS WERE BOOSTING THEIR TELEVISION RATINGS 2)THEY WERE RAKING IN MILLIONS OF $ FROM GULLIBLE CHRISTIANS IN THE FORM OF DONATIONS, AND 3)JONATHAN CAHN AND HIS PUBLISHER WERE MAKING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN BOOK SALES AND OTHER PRODUCTS ASSOCIATED WITH HIS MYSTERIES. THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY AN INDUSTRY OF RELIGIOUS PROFESSIONAL FRAUDS.  FOR MORE DETAILS WATCH THE VIDEO BELOW EXPOSING JONATHAN CAHN'S SHEMITAH SCAM.
 As we had seen previously with the blood moons, many made a profit through misapplying scripture and intentionally misleading others to the meaning of what was taking place.






Some Biblical quotes for the reader to ponder:

Deuteronomy 13:1-5

Worshiping Other Gods

13 [a]If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a sign or wonder, and if the sign or wonder spoken of takes place, and the prophet says, “Let us follow other gods” (gods you have not known) “and let us worship them,” you must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. The Lord your God is testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your soul. It is the Lord your God you must follow, and him you must revere. Keep his commands and obey him; serve him and hold fast to him. That prophet or dreamer must be put to death for inciting rebellion against the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt and redeemed you from the land of slavery. That prophet or dreamer tried to turn you from the way the Lord your God commanded you to follow. You must purge the evil from among you.

"But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.’ And if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?’— when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him." (Deuteronomy 18:20-22)

The warning in the above scriptural passages is urgently needed for today. Some of God's people are so enamored by the supernatural that they are ready to receive anyone who demonstrates supernatural power or divine revelation knowledge as necessarily being a true servant of God. But the passages quoted above indicates that this attitude is UN SCRIPTURAL & DANGEROUS.

To get the full picture we need to combine the above two passages( Deuteronomy 13:1-5 &  Deuteronomy 18: 20-22)  that clearly show us how to identify a false prophet like Jonathan Cahn.  

The first passage warns us  against a prophet who gives us a supernatural sign that is fulfilled, but at the same time teaches disobedience or disloyalty towards God. The second passage warns that a prophet who makes some supernatural prediction  that is not fulfilled is a false prophet. 

By induction we  arrive at the following conclusion: A TRUE PROPHET OF GOD IS ONE WHO GIVES A SUPERNATURAL SIGN OR MAKES A PREDICTION THAT IS FULFILLED, BUT WHO ALSO TEACHES LOYALTY TO GOD AND HIS WORD.  JONATHAN CAHN'S HARBINGER OF THE SHEMITAH NEVER CAME TO FRUITION. THEREFORE BY BIBLICAL DEFINITION JONATHAN CAHN IS A FALSE PROPHET!
 
Another method the false prophets use to keep their following after the time for the prophecy has come and gone, is to say that the precise timing of the prophecy can change (even though they previously put a date on it). They say the event will still happen but of course it never does unless its fulfillment in time is obvious. If gullible people are going to believe these type of excuses then how can any prophet ever be proven false?  

If a professing christian gives a supernatural sign or prophetic prediction that is not fulfilled, he/she needs to immediately take the following steps:

1)Publicly acknowledge that  the sign or prediction is totally false

2) Ask forgiveness from all Christians that were deceived 

3) If people who were deceived  suffered loss or damages, do everything possible to make amends and   restitution 

AS OF THE TIME OF THIS POSTING JONATHAN CAHN HAS  NOT  SATISFIED THE ABOVE 3 CONDITIONS.

Here is a segment from an article by Berit Kjos about Jonathan Cahn.

Criticism: "It is stated that Jonathan Cahn `says that Zohar, an extra biblical, mystical source from which the occultic and mystical Kabbalah is derived, greatly influenced his writing.'"

Cahn's answer: "Unfortunately this kind of statements represents some of the extreme and bizarre opposition to The Harbinger - It is an extreme false accusation. No. I have never in my life said that the Zohar has greatly influenced my writing - nor has it ever. ... Rabbinical writings, mystical or otherwise, have been quoted for ages, in Bible commentaries, apologetics, works such as The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah," etc....

I MAKE THE FOLLOWING QUOTATION FROM TED W. PIKE'S BOOK "ISRAEL OUR DUTY OUR DELIMMA" FROM PAGE 103: " The Kabbalah at this time was a Babylonian brew which included such occult features as REINCARNATION, NECROMANCY, CONJURATION, ASTRAL PROJECTION, COOPERATION WITH DEMONS, ASTROLOGY, NUMEROLOGY, AND A VAST SYSTEM FOR THE USE OF CHARMS, AMULETS & INCANTATIONS". In short, most of what was distinctive of BABYLONIAN & EGYPTIAN SORCERY WAS INCLUDED IN THE ZOHAR! Even today virtually all occult systems (especially THEOSOPHICAL ONES) and practices, including WITCHCRAFT & SATANISM, borrow heavily from the KABBALAH(AS PRESERVED IN THE ZOHAR) in their rituals and symbolism".

Writings — There are always some extra-Biblical writings which are considered equal to or superior to the Bible. The Mormons have their Pearl of Great Price. The Children of God look to the letters of their founder, Moses David (David Berg). The prophetic proclamations of Herbert W. Armstrong are revered as scripture by many Armstrongites. The Jehovah’s Witnesses have their own eccentric “translation” of the Scriptures. It is actually a version that simply rewords all the verses that conflict with their theology.  And Jonathan Cahn has The Zohar and The Babylonian Talmud as his extra-biblical writings to unlock bogus mysteries.

Many cult leaders claim to have a direct pipeline to God. The teachings of cult leaders often change and, hence, they need new revelations to justify such changes. In view of this deluge of prophetic counterfeits, believers have an unparalleled need for a deeper understanding of authentic Christianity. For it is impossible to recognize a prophetic fraud unless we have an understanding of what is prophetically genuine. Error can only be correctly measured over against the truth of God's inerrant word.

The fact is, cult leaders are NOTORIOUS SCRIPTURE TWISTERS. When dealing with cults, one must keep in mind that they are always built not upon what the bible teaches, but upon what the FOUNDERS/LEADERS OF THE RESPECTIVE CULTS SAY THE BIBLE TEACHES! And such is the case with many of Jonathan Cahn's bogus mysteries and apologetics.

DEAR CHRISTIAN VIEWER: YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. JEWISH GNOSTICISM IS BEING SUBTLY IMPORTED INTO MAINSTREAM CHRISTIANITY. DON'T ALLOW YOUR ETERNAL DESTINY TO BE PLACED IN JEOPARDY!


I FOUND THESE TWO WEBSITES WHICH I BELIEVE SHEDS MORE LIGHT ON HOW JONATHAN CAHN DEVELOPED HIS CONCEPT TO HIS NEW BOOK:

Book of Mysteries
Ancient  text found among the Dead Sea Scrolls from the mysterious Essene cult...



Friday, August 26, 2016

The Rebuilding of the Third Jewish Temple




Rebuilding the Jewish Temple 


The Temple Mount Faithful are ready right now to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem. But it will require a dramatic change of the political equation. 'Peace and security' must be fully assured for the Third Temple to be constructed on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. This rebuilding is prophesied to go forward. So who will have guaranteed the peace? And how will it have come about? Click on the link: Rebuilding the Jewish Temple below for more details.
Third Temple LOCATION FOUND!!! - Blogger
seraphimre.blogspot.com/...third-temple-location-found.html

Friday, August 19, 2016

HOW THE HUMAN RACE EVOLVED



THE ORIGIN OF RACE
By Cooper P. Abrams, III
*All rights reserved.
CONTENTSIntroduction.
What is Race?
Biblical Passages which have been Supposed to Indicate the Origin of Race.
The Role of Genetics in Race
Conclusion


     
        Japheth is the father of the Caucasian race; Shem of the Mongoloid race; and Ham of the Negroid race. Some have interpreted Noah's prophecies of his sons in Genesis 9 to be the Scriptural basis for discrimination of one race against another. Particularly, the supposed curse on Ham's son, Canaan, was purported to be biblical support for Negro slavery. We will deal with that later in this paper.
         Basically, race is a vague term and is difficult to define. If race is based upon the color and texture of hair by what guidelines are we to classify the different shades of hair from black to blonde? A look at any group of people indicates that hair color has little to do with what we think of as race. In any group of Caucasian people, no two hair shades are alike. Hair texture and a person's stature also differ between one individual and another. Although skin color appears to be an easier method of distinguishing one race from another, a closer look reveals that this too is only a vague rule of thumb. The problem lies in determining how to classify all the varying shades of color between black and white. In order to accomplish this, one must increase the number of races and list various subgroups. As the classification process continues it tends to make classification less significant and definable.
         Thus, the task of defining race is highly subjective and therefore, unscientific. We can consequently conclude that race is not clearly definable and is not a good term to use in describing variations among people.
         The question we must first answer is: "Are there races of men?" The difficulty of classifying man into races has been shown. Perhaps a better term would be "varieties" of man. Even evolutionary science concludes that all existing varieties of man are members of the same species.2   Inter-racial marriages are common and children are produced with no biological difficulties. Prominent anthropologist, Ruth Benedict in her book, "Race: Science and Politics" stated the peoples of the earth are a single family and have a common origin.3
         Once supposed biological differences, such as dissimilarity in blood, have proven to be incorrect. Blood is classified according to type, and all types are found within all supposed races of man. Blood transfusions are based on types A, B, AB, and O and are given without regard to race.4   It has also been supposed that different races have differing intelligence levels. This false and racist idea concludes that the Caucasian race is the most intelligent with the Negroid race being the least intelligent. This idea originated with Charles Darwin's false, inflammatory, and evolutionary idea that man is a descendent of primates. He concluded quite unscientifically that the Negro is more closely related to monkeys and apes because they look more like a primate. Since a Caucasian looks the least like a primate, Darwin said they were higher up on the supposed evolutionary chain and was more intelligent. Often the Oriental is portrayed as being the more advanced species of man because of less body hair.
         Modern testing of the races has shown that intelligence is not a measurement of race, because intelligence levels differ greatly with individuals within every race. Further cultural influence and advantages account for most supposed examples of differing intelligence. 5
        The next question is "Can race be Biblically defined?" The term race does not appear in the Bible. The Bible refers to differing peoples in terms such as family, tribe, people and nation. It groups people according to familial relationships and then into nationalities. An example of familial relationship is found in Genesis 10, where the genealogies listed are grouped by family and tribe. It should be noted that nowhere are the sons of Noah associated with race or color. An important passage on this matter is found in Genesis 10:5:

           "By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations" (Gen. 10:5).

         Note that familial and national division is shown, as well as division by geography and language (tongue). The significance of this will be discussed later in this paper. Nowhere in the Bible is prejudice based on what we determine as race; i.e. color of hair, skin, eyes or physical characteristics. When God commanded the children of Israel to be a separated people or to utterly destroy other peoples, it was always based upon the principle of separation from sin. The same principle of separation is presented in the New Testament when Christians are commanded to come out of the world and not be unequally yoked with the unsaved. (See 2 Cor. 6:14)
         In Scripture, there are several references to problems in which people with different racial backgrounds were involved. In each case, the instruction is clear that God made no distinction between races regarding salvation or blessing. In Numbers 12:1-16, Miriam and Aaron openly criticized Moses for marrying an Ethiopian woman. However, the issue was not racial, but jealousy over Moses' leadership, and the criticism was over marrying a foreigner, any foreigner, and not because she was an Ethiopian (see Number 12:2). In Acts 13:1 we read of "Simeon that was called Niger" and "Luis of Cyrene". Simeon was also referred to by his Latin name "Niger" ("Niger" translates as "black" in English).
         Lucius was from Cyrene (Cyrene was an ancient city in North Africa; ancient Cyrene the modern city of Shahhat, Libya Simeon and Lucius are therefore thought to be black men who had an active place in the church at Antioch. Their names and countries are the only clues given regarding their race. As we see here in Acts 13:1, and in other parts of the Bible, when God spoke of groups of people, it was always in the context of their nationality and not their race. The most notable reference to racial prejudice was the Jews unfavorable feelings for the Samaritans. The Samaritans were racially mixed people that the Assyrian colonists brought in order to settle Palestine, after Israel was taken captive and only a remnant of Jews were left in the land. The Jews who were left in the land inter-married with these non-Jews, which were forbidden in Israel. These groups not only mixed racially, but also merged their religions into a Judaistic cult which the orthodox Jews hated.
       The Jews also perverted their special position with God into a false national and ethnic pride that looked down on all Gentiles seeing them as "dogs." They considered themselves as superior to all other peoples, however, their ethnic pride did not come from God but from their sinful hearts. When God called Abraham, as Genesis 12:3 records, he stated that "In thee all the families of earth would be blessed." Genesis 22:18, says that from Abraham's seed ". . .all the nations of earth would be blessed." Both these passages are Messianic references to the coming of Christ, the Savior of the World as Paul explains in Galatians 3:6. God's offer of salvation was to the entire world (see Matt. 28:19-20; Acts 1:8; 10:1-11:18; I John 2:2).
        See the following classic passage in Romans 10:11-13:
           "For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved” (Rom. 10:11-13).
         Both the Old and New Testaments show that God does not hold any significance to race. God sees all people as one people called "man." Physical characteristics are not a part of God's evaluation of man ". . .for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart" (I Samuel l6:7).
         God states clearly He is not a respecter of persons, and that includes race or nationality.. "Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But inevery nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him." (Acts 10:34-35)
         Race, as defined by Webster's Dictionary, is not a Biblical term and nowhere can it be shown that physical characteristics of people are a reason or a guide to distinguish one from another.

    BIBLICAL PASSAGES WHICH HAVE BEEN
    SUPPOSED TO INDICATE THE ORIGIN OF RACES.
        The Curse on Cain
    Genesis 4:11-15
         Often we hear the mark of "Cain" being related to the black race. To briefly deal with this erroneous idea it should be simply pointed out that the Hebrew word "oth" does not mean "mark" as an outward physical token or mark placed on Cain. Leupold says that the word is better translated "sign."6 Also, the text does not say that God set a mark "in" or "on" Cain and certainly does not even hint at the mark being related to his skin color or physical characteristics. The word used indicates God gave him a sign of guaranty, or an assurance that he would be protected. Ryrie says it was a sign to reassure him of God's gracious protection of his life.7 Furthermore, even if one were to take the position that Cain was given the mark of being black, all of his progeny died in the flood and since Noah's sons were Sethites (Genesis 5) the curse would have ended with the flood, rendering the issue moot.
    The Curse on Canaan. 
    Genesis 9:18-27
         One of the great tragedies of this erroneous biblical interpretation has been the interpretation by some of Genesis 9:18-27 bring related to a curse upon the black people. Specifically, some individuals have used the prophecy of Canaan being the "servant of servants" to mean that he would be the slave of Shem and Japheth.
         Leupold believes that the curse was on Canaan and did not include Ham's three other sons.8 If this is a correct interpretation, it would be difficult to relate the Negroes of Africa to the descendants of Canaan who settled in the Middle East.
         Henry Morris believes the curse was addressed to Canaan, but included all of Ham's progeny as well. He reasons that the prophecy seems to have worldwide implications and that if the curse was limited to Canaan and his descendants then historically the prophecy has not been properly fulfilled. He states that although the prophecy is addressed to Canaan, it was Ham who committed the sin.9    He explains that the servant of servant”  phrase does not mean slave of slaves” and in history this has not occurred among Ham's decedents.10
         A strong argument against this passage having any racial implications is the fact that Ham's descendants are not all black. Ham's progeny includes the Egyptians, Sumerians, and Ethiopians. Further, Canaanites who settled in the Middle East do not appear to be black. Morris also states that these three streams are not three races which is not what the Bible teaches, nor what modern anthropology and human genetics teach."11
         No matter which view is held, the passage cannot be used to support the idea that the Negro or black people originated in the curse or that slavery is justified.
     
    Genesis 11:1—9
         The search for a correct understanding of the varieties of man (races) is found within these passages. To begin, verse one states that all mankind spoke the same language. This is completely contradictory to evolution, which teaches that language evolved from animal sounds to speech, and finally to language. Because there was no language barrier, all men on earth conversed freely with all others. Just think of what that would do toward relieving international tensions today. Men could communicate with each other with full understanding; however, man lost that ability due to his sin.
         Such was the situation at the tower of Babel. The people congregated and built a great city which was in direct opposition to God's expressed command to scatter and populate the earth. (Genesis 9:1) Because of their disobedience, God "confounded" their language and scattered them over all the earth (Gen. 11:7-8). The scattering of these groups all over the earth, which created genetic isolation, is the real cause for the origin of modern races of people.
         The act of confounding the language of man records that many different languages were created and that each family of people had their own separate language. This division was not based on skin color or physical characteristics, but on familial relationships. Families or tribes of people were given a common language, and they separated from other groups speaking a different language. The passage also says that God scattered them over the entire surface of the world. It is important to realize just what was occurring in this incident. As the people began to group themselves together, based on their common language, they began to migrate in all directions away from Babel. At Babel, they were a homogeneous people, but with God giving them different languages, they separated and in time became heterogeneous.
         God did not indiscriminately change the languages among the people, because to do so would have broken up and confounded families. The genealogies in Genesis 10 extend beyond the time of confusion of languages so it would seem that God kept families together by giving them the same language. Furthermore, Genesis 10:5 states that God divided them by language, family and nations.
         At this point, it is very important to keep in mind that as these groups of people migrated further from the Middle East they became isolated from other groups. This separation caused isolation from other groups resulted in breeding within a specific smaller number people. Because of isolation, genetics then began to limit the physical characteristics of their offspring as the dominate genes began to emerge.

Saturday, July 23, 2016

Were Adam and Eve Caucasian or black?

Were Adam and Eve Caucasian or black? Is the whole world related? How did black people occur?



These questions have been on people’s lips for ages. The answers provided in history have been wide-ranging and varied. The Bible is clear: "God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." (Genesis 1:27)  But what about the different races and skin colors? How did they come about? One thing that we do know is that God created the human race and that we all came from Adam and Eve.

Is the whole world related?
Acts 17:26-28 says, “He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their habitation, so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us. For in Him we live and move and have our being …’For we are also His offspring.’ ”
These verses tell us that mankind has come about from one gene pool which God created, and we all have the same limitations. We can only use human blood for transfusions and not insect or bird's blood to sustain life. The times that affect us-–birth, death, Jesus 1st and 2nd coming, the seasons, the prophecies of the Bible--have the same effect on all of the human race. Our very length of life in a sinful world is determined by God. None of us will live forever without Him, in spite of medical science and all it's advances.
So why are some people black and some white? The Bible doesn’t give a definite answer to this question. Because man is curious and often wants to know what God has not told us, he begins to speculate. This is not sin as long as we don’t turn our answers into dogma.  Let's not forget that what we think is just that – not revelation.  For the sake of this question, let's take a look at some of the ideas people have considered in an effort to explain the races.  Please keep in mind that Word of Truth Radio.com does not accept, endorse, support, or promote any of these ideas!
One idea that has surfaced comes from Genesis 4:15. After Cain killed Able the Bible says that Cain felt insecure about life and God said, “Therefore, whoever kills Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold.” and “the Lord set a mark on Cain, lest anyone finding him should kill him.” Some have concluded that this “mark” was black skin. First of all, we don’t know what the mark was, but is it possible that the black gene was started with Cain and carried onto the ark in one of Noah’s sons or daughter-in-laws? Not very likely at all. That would be a very prejudiced viewpoint in our opinion, and a view that has no Scriptural evidence.

Others have jumped on
Genesis 9:25 (This is the curse Noah placed on Canaan for his father Ham's lack of respect.) “Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants he shall be to his brethren.”  Some have tried to suggest that the people of Africa can trace their ancestry back to Ham.  Here the conclusion is drawn that the black race has been in slavery more than any race in human history; therefore, it is concluded that this curse was genetically followed into Ham’s offspring. However, the curse was placed on Canaan, not Ham.  Canaan's descendents where the Canaanites and they dwelt in what is now modern Israel (Genesis 9:15-19). People wanting to bolster the doctrine of slavery in the Southern United States in the 1800’s advocated this theory of black people being "cursed". Obviously, this is a very rude and prejudiced idea that is totally lacking in supportive evidence.

Some Christians believe that just as man is currently tinkering with the genes of plants and animals (and humans), scientists of Noah’s day tinkered with the genes of the animals and altered animal life, producing the prehistoric monsters we now know as dinosaurs. If we want to daydream, perhaps we could wonder if they also manipulated human embryos. Who knows? Maybe this is why God is silent on the matter. Why give the sinful heart an idea God deplores?

A better conjecture is the idea of variety. When we investigate our world, we see that God has put in place a gene pool that has made possible a whole panorama of color and shapes: in the flower world, in the breeds of dogs that are possible, etc., etc. The same is true with the human race: we have a spectrum of profiles and colors, as this seems to have been God's plan from the beginning.  We don't have to explain it; we only need to accept it.  Some scientists arrogantly suggest that Caucasians are farther up the ladder because they have reached a superior level of evolution.  Does this sound like something that our loving Creator would allow?  Of course not!  We can be sure that the devil is behind this type of absurd reasoning.  Let's not forget that all men are equal in the sight of God.  "For man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart."
(1 Samuel 16:7)
--Thanks to George Blumenschein for contributing to this question!  Although we would like to know everything, our humans minds are limited. God has not revealed the answers to all of life's questions, but he has given us enough information for that which is most important in life: a relationship with Him through His Son Jesus Christ.  That's what really matters! The good news is that every human being has equal access to His Heavenly Kingdom, regardless of our skin color.

Friday, July 15, 2016

WHAT BLACK LIVES MATTER ORGANIZERS ARE NOT TELLING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE



Crime Stats Alarm Black Leaders



• Shocking new study on youth arrests lays bare facts about crime and race in America
By Victor Thorn
The implications are shocking: Nearly 50% of all black males and 38% of white men will be arrested by the age of 23. These statistics, compiled by four college professors between the years 1997-2008, were published in the January 6 edition of the journal Crime & Delinquency.
The biggest question one takes away from this study is what types of crimes are these young adults committing? Not surprisingly, there exists a great deal of variance depending on the perpetrator’s race.
A 2012 study by the Department of Justice’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention revealed that in 2010 black youths committed six times more murders, three times more rapes, 10 times more robberies and three times more assaults than did their white counterparts.
Similar statistics were released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the “Uniform Crime Reports.” They determined, “In the year 2008, black youths, who make up 16% of the youth population, accounted for 52% of juvenile violent crime arrests, including 58% for homicide and 67% for robbery.” By contrast, the only categories where white youths surpassed blacks were in liquor law violations and driving under the influence.
Even black civil rights advocates such as Van Jones, President Barack Obama’s former green jobs czar, confirmed these findings. In his October 5, 2005 article, “Are Blacks a Criminal Race?” Jones wrote, “African American youth represent 32% of all weapons arrests [and] were arrested for aggravated assault at a rate nearly three times that of whites.”
To better comprehend this trend, on January 10 AMERICAN FREE PRESS spoke with veteran journalist and author Alan Caruba. When questioned about the proliferation of black crime, Caruba explained, “The black community is afflicted with all kinds of problems based on a long history of failing to integrate fully into the overall community.”
Pointing to current events, Caruba explained: “The knockout game is a good example of what’s wrong today. It goes straight to the heart of how [blacks] are raised. It’s a disturbing trend that all of us need to pay more attention to.”
The so-called “knockout game” was made popular largely by gangs of teenage blacks who select a random person and try to knock them unconscious with one punch to the head or face.
Although few publications other than AFP have the courage to buck political correctness and address the actualities of this social cancer in a forthright manner, in a2011 speech Philadelphia’s black Mayor Michael Nutter offered the following admonishment to black youths:
“You have damaged your own race,” he said. “Take those damned hoodies down. Pull your pants up and buy a belt because no one wants to see your underwear or the crack of your butt.”
Summarizing this entire matter was former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy who, on September 30, 2005 declared:
“Some identifiable groups . . . commit crime at a rate that is higher than the national rate. Blacks are such a group. That is simply a fact.”


IN ORDER TO SUMMARIZE HERE ARE THE HARDCORE FACTS:

WHILE ONLY AROUND 12% OF THE U.S. POPULATION ARE
OUT NUMBERED BY OTHER RACES BY 9 TO 1:


AFRICAN AMERICANS COMMIT BETWEEN 51% AND 60% OF THE MURDERS
AFRICAN AMERICANS ARE ARRESTED FOR 57- 61% OF THE ROBBERIES
AFRICAN AMERICANS COMMIT OVER 50% OF THE ROBBERIES
AFRICAN AMERICANS COMMIT OVER 50% OF RAPES AND CHOOSE WHITE WOMEN AS THEIR VICTIMS
OVER 50% OF BLACK MALES WILL BE ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH A SERIOUS FELONY IN THEIR LIFETIME
BLACK VIOLENT CRIMES TARGETS WHITES OVER 50% OF THE TIME
The FBI Uniform Crime Reports are available on the Internet at

Thursday, July 14, 2016

Slavery and Emancipation under President Lincoln

... of the united states abraham lincoln once said as our case is new we


"Given the “differences” between the two races and the hostile attitudes of whites towards blacks, Lincoln argued, it would be “better for us both, therefore, to be separated.”

ABRAHAM LINCOLN ACCURATELY PREDICTED THAT BLACKS AND WHITES COULD NOT CO-EXIST PEACEFULLY IN AMERICA. GIVEN THE RECENT SHOOTINGS WHICH TOOK PLACE IN DALLAS, TEXAS AGAINST 5 WHITE POLICE OFFICERS AND THE CIVIL UNREST WHICH IS TAKING PLACE AROUND THE COUNTRY, IT IS NOT DIFFICULT TO ACCEPT HIS STATEMENT AS A SELF FULFILLING PROPHECY.


On September 22 1862, Abraham Lincoln issued his preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, in which he declared that as of January 1, 1863, all slaves in states in rebellion against the Union "shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free." To commemorate the occasion, we invite you to consider some surprising facts about Lincoln's views on slavery, and the complex process that led him to issue the document he later called "the central act of my administration, and the greatest event of the 19th century."

1. Lincoln wasn’t an abolitionist.
Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count slaves for the purposes of representation in the federal government. In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed slaves should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and slave owners. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854. Though Lincoln saw himself as working alongside the abolitionists on behalf of a common anti-slavery cause, he did not count himself among them. Only with emancipation, and with his support of the eventual 13th Amendment, would Lincoln finally win over the most committed abolitionists.

2. Lincoln didn’t believe blacks should have the same rights as whites.
Though Lincoln argued that the founding fathers’ phrase “All men are created equal” applied to blacks and whites alike, this did not mean he thought they should have the same social and political rights. His views became clear during an 1858 series of debates with his opponent in the Illinois race for U.S. Senate, Stephen Douglas, who had accused him of supporting “negro equality.” In their fourth debate, at Charleston, Illinois, on September 18, 1858, Lincoln made his position clear. “I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races,” he began, going on to say that he opposed blacks having the right to vote, to serve on juries, to hold office and to intermarry with whites. What he did believe was that, like all men, blacks had the right to improve their condition in society and to enjoy the fruits of their labor. In this way they were equal to white men, and for this reason slavery was inherently unjust.
Like his views on emancipation, Lincoln’s position on social and political equality for African-Americans would evolve over the course of his presidency. In the last speech of his life, delivered on April 11, 1865, he argued for limited black suffrage, saying that any black man who had served the Union during the Civil War should have the right to vote.

3. Lincoln thought colonization could resolve the issue of slavery.
For much of his career, Lincoln believed that colonization—or the idea that a majority of the African-American population should leave the United States and settle in Africa or Central America—was the best way to confront the problem of slavery. His two great political heroes, Henry Clay and Thomas Jefferson, had both favored colonization; both were slave owners who took issue with aspects of slavery but saw no way that blacks and whites could live together peaceably. Lincoln first publicly advocated for colonization in 1852, and in 1854 said that his first instinct would be “to free all the slaves, and send them to Liberia” (the African state founded by the American Colonization Society in 1821).
Nearly a decade later, even as he edited the draft of the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation in August of 1862, Lincoln hosted a delegation of freed slaves at the White House in the hopes of getting their support on a plan for colonization in Central America. Given the “differences” between the two races and the hostile attitudes of whites towards blacks, Lincoln argued, it would be “better for us both, therefore, to be separated.” Lincoln’s support of colonization provoked great anger among black leaders and abolitionists, who argued that African-Americans were as much natives of the country as whites, and thus deserved the same rights. After he issued the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln never again publicly mentioned colonization, and a mention of it in an earlier draft was deleted by the time the final proclamation was issued in January 1863.

4. Emancipation was a military policy. 
As much as he hated the institution of slavery, Lincoln didn’t see the Civil War as a struggle to free the nation’s 4 million slaves from bondage. Emancipation, when it came, would have to be gradual, and the important thing to do was to prevent the Southern rebellion from severing the Union permanently in two. But as the Civil War entered its second summer in 1862, thousands of slaves had fled Southern plantations to Union lines, and the federal government didn’t have a clear policy on how to deal with them. Emancipation, Lincoln saw, would further undermine the Confederacy while providing the Union with a new source of manpower to crush the rebellion.
In July 1862 the president presented his draft of the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation to his cabinet. Secretary of State William Seward urged him to wait until things were going better for the Union on the field of battle, or emancipation might look like the last gasp of a nation on the brink of defeat. Lincoln agreed and returned to edit the draft over the summer. On September 17 the bloody Battle of Antietam gave Lincoln the opportunity he needed. He issued the preliminary proclamation to his cabinet on September 22, and it was published the following day. As a cheering crowd gathered at the White House, Lincoln addressed them from a balcony: “I can only trust in God I have made no mistake … It is now for the country and the world to pass judgment on it.”

5. The Emancipation Proclamation didn’t actually free all of the slaves.
Since Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a military measure, it didn’t apply to border slave states like Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, all of which had remained loyal to the Union. Lincoln also exempted selected areas of the Confederacy that had already come under Union control in hopes of gaining the loyalty of whites in those states. In practice, then, the Emancipation Proclamation didn’t immediately free a single slave, as the only places it applied were places where the federal government had no control—the Southern states currently fighting against the Union.
Despite its limitations, Lincoln’s proclamation marked a crucial turning point in the evolution of Lincoln’s views of slavery, as well as a turning point in the Civil War itself. By war’s end, some 200,000 black men would serve in the Union Army and Navy, striking a mortal blow against the institution of slavery and paving the way for its eventual abolition by the 13th Amendment.

A final word:
What About The Debt Blacks Owe To America?

Slavery existed for thousands of years before the Atlantic slave trade was born, and in all societies. But in the thousand years of its existence, there never was an anti-slavery movement until white Christians - Englishmen and Americans -- created one. If not for the anti-slavery attitudes and military power of white Christian Englishmen and Americans, the slave trade would not have been brought to an end. If not for the sacrifices of white soldiers and a white American president who gave his life to sign the Emancipation Proclamation, blacks in America would still be slaves. If not for the dedication of Americans of all ethnicities and colors to a society based on the principle that all men are created equal, blacks in America would not enjoy the highest standard of living of blacks anywhere in the world, and indeed one of the highest standards of living of any people in the world. They would not enjoy the greatest freedoms and the most thoroughly protected individual rights anywhere. Where is the gratitude of black America and its leaders for those gifts? For the answer to that question go to the link below:

New “Reparations” Website Asks Whites to Pay ... - Infowars